Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Developers and MCGM from Recognizing TDR Transfer Agreements in Alleged Fraud by Society Members. Co-operative Housing Society Obtains Interim Relief Against Sale of Transferable Development Rights (TDR) Under DRC Dated 7 August 2023 Amidst Allegations of Forgery and Unauthorized Payments.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 160
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the acquisition of a portion of the plaintiff co-operative housing society's land by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) in 1986 for road construction. Compensation in the form of Transferable Development Rights (TDR) was later claimed by the society. A Development Rights Certificate (DRC) was issued on 7 August 2023, granting FSI credit of 14,568.20 sq.mtrs. Between August and September 2023, the society entered into unregistered agreements for sale of TDR with various developers (defendant nos. 5-18). The society later discovered alleged irregularities, including forgery of the secretary's signatures on some agreements, unauthorized payments of Rs.15 crores to a consultant (defendant no. 4), and a broader fraud orchestrated by certain members. An internal audit highlighted irregularities, and statutory authorities under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 initiated inspections and audits. The society filed a commercial suit seeking declarations regarding the TDR agreements and recovery of money from defendant nos. 1-4, and an interim application for temporary injunction. The interim application sought to restrain defendants 5-18 from acting on the TDR agreements, to restrain MCGM from recognizing those agreements, and to direct defendants 1-4 to deposit Rs.16.51 crores. The matter was argued before Justice Sandeep V. Marne, and judgment was reserved. The text does not include the court's analysis or decision.

Issue of Consideration

Whether interim injunction should be granted to restrain transfer and utilization of TDR on grounds of alleged fraud and forgery

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (10) 48

Interim Application (L) No. 5342 of 2025 in Commercial Suit (L) No. 5307 of 2025

2025-10-03

Sandeep V. Marne, J.

2025:BHC-OS:17428

Prateek Seksaria, Sharan Jagtiani, Pravin Samdani, G.S. Godbole, Simil Purohit, Mayur Khandeparkar, Karl Tamboly, S.R. Ganbavale, Rubin Vakil, Mehul Shah, Janhavee Joshi, Yogesh C. Naidu, Sahil Gandhi, Drupat Patil

Green Garden Apartments Co-operative Housing Society Limited

Nitin Chaudhari and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Commercial suit seeking declarations and recovery of money, with interim application for temporary injunction to restrain transfer and utilization of Transferable Development Rights (TDR) arising from a Development Rights Certificate, alleging fraud and forgery.

Remedy Sought

Temporary injunction restraining defendants 5-18 from acting on agreements for sale of TDR, restraining defendant 19-MCGM from recognizing those agreements, and directing defendants 1-4 to deposit Rs.16.51 crores.

Filing Reason

Alleged large-scale fraud in sale of TDR, unauthorized payments to consultants, forgery of signatures on agreements, and misappropriation of society funds.

Previous Decisions

Deputy Registrar passed order dated 16 December 2024 under Section 89(a) appointing officers to inspect accounts; Divisional Joint Registrar passed order dated 23 December 2024 under Section 83(3)(b) for audit by Flying Squad; enquiry under Section 75(5) initiated. Society filed revision application before the Minister for Co-operation against those orders. No prior court orders on this suit.

Issues

Whether temporary injunction should be granted restraining defendants 5-18 from acting on TDR agreements Whether defendant 19-MCGM should be restrained from recognizing the agreements Whether defendants 1-4 should be directed to deposit Rs.16.51 crores

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff contended that the impugned Agreements for Sale of TDR executed in favour of Defendant Nos.5 to 18 are without lawful consideration and vitiated by fraud. Other arguments and submissions of defendants not detailed in the provided text.

Judgment Excerpts

Plaintiff is a co-operative housing society and an owner of piece and parcel of land admeasuring 26,983 sq.mtrs at Village-Borla, Taluka-Kurla, Mumbai Suburban District at Deonar, Mumbai – 400 088. On 7 August 2023, MCGM issued DRC in favour of the Plaintiff-Society under which Society secured FSI credit of built-up area equivalent to 14,568.20 sq.mtrs. Society's auditor, N.K. Kalara submitted report on 22 December 2024 highlighting irregularities in sale of TDR.

Procedural History

Plaintiff-Society filed the commercial suit on 17 February 2025 along with the interim application. Prior to suit, the Society discovered alleged fraud, conducted internal audit, and received auditor's report on 22 December 2024. The Deputy Registrar passed an order on 16 December 2024 under Section 89(a) of the MCS Act appointing officers to inspect accounts. The Divisional Joint Registrar passed an order on 23 December 2024 under Section 83(3)(b) for audit by Flying Squad. An enquiry under Section 75(5) was initiated. The Society filed a revision before the Minister for Co-operation. Notices were issued to defendants. After filing of the suit, the interim application was taken up for hearing. Affidavits-in-reply were filed by various defendants. The application was argued on 19 September 2025 and judgment was reserved until pronouncement on 3 October 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: 89(a), 83(3)(b), 75(5)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows University Appeal in CAS Promotion Date Dispute — Service in Affiliated College Not Counted for Promotion Prior to Joining University. The Court held that the effective date of promotion under CAS cannot be antedated to a perio...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Landlord's Right to Resume Land for Personal Cultivation Under Section 38 of Bombay Tenancy Act — Surrender of Tenancy Validated. The court held that the surrender of tenancy was voluntary and genuine, and the landlords we...