Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Coastal Regulation Zone Notification for Versova Mangroves — No Violation of CRZ Norms Found. Court held that the impugned notification dated 18.01.2019 was issued after due consideration of all relevant factors and did not violate the CRZ Notification, 2011.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present Public Interest Litigation was filed by 14 petitioners, including residents of Versova, Mumbai, and the Jai Bharat Cooperative Housing Society Limited, challenging the notification dated 18.01.2019 issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) under the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) Notification, 2011. The petitioners alleged that the impugned notification reclassified certain areas in Versova from CRZ-I (ecologically sensitive) to CRZ-II/III (built-up area/rural area), which would lead to destruction of mangroves and violate CRZ norms. They sought quashing of the notification and a direction to maintain the status quo. The respondents, including the Union of India and the State of Maharashtra, defended the notification, stating that it was issued after a detailed scientific study and due consideration of all relevant factors, including the presence of mangroves. The court examined the notification and the CRZ Notification, 2011, and found that the classification was in accordance with the law. The court noted that the impugned notification had been issued after following the due process, including public consultation and expert committee review. The court held that there was no violation of CRZ norms and that the petitioners had failed to make out a case for interference. The PIL was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Environmental Law - Coastal Regulation Zone - Validity of Notification - CRZ Notification, 2011 - The petitioners challenged the notification dated 18.01.2019 which reclassified certain areas in Versova, Mumbai, from CRZ-I to CRZ-II/III, alleging that it would lead to destruction of mangroves and violate CRZ norms. The court examined the notification and found that it was issued after due consideration of all relevant factors, including the presence of mangroves, and that the classification was in accordance with the CRZ Notification, 2011. The court held that there was no violation of CRZ norms and dismissed the PIL. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned notification dated 18.01.2019 issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change under the Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2011, is violative of the CRZ norms and requires to be set aside.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court dismissed the Public Interest Litigation with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Public Interest Litigation
  • Coastal Regulation Zone
  • Environmental Protection
  • Mangrove Conservation
  • Sustainable Development
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (12) 75

Public Interest Litigation (L) 23 of 2019

2020-12-04

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation challenging a notification under the Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2011.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the impugned notification dated 18.01.2019 and direction to maintain status quo.

Filing Reason

Allegation that the impugned notification reclassified CRZ-I areas to CRZ-II/III, leading to destruction of mangroves.

Issues

Whether the impugned notification dated 18.01.2019 is violative of CRZ norms and requires to be set aside.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the notification would lead to destruction of mangroves and violate CRZ norms. Respondents argued that the notification was issued after due process and scientific study.

Ratio Decidendi

The impugned notification was issued after due consideration of all relevant factors and in accordance with the CRZ Notification, 2011; no violation of CRZ norms found.

Judgment Excerpts

The court held that there was no violation of CRZ norms and dismissed the PIL.

Procedural History

The PIL was filed in 2019 and heard by the Bombay High Court, which delivered judgment on 04.12.2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2011:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Coastal Regulation Zone Notification for Versova Mangroves — No Violation of CRZ Norms Found. Court held that the impugned notification dated 18.01.2019 was issued after due consideration of all relevant ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Trial Court's Finding of Inconsistencies Between Dying Declarations and Medical Evidence Under Sections 302 and 307 IPC Upheld as Plau...