Search Results for "Development Control Regulation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Development Control Regulation"

1595 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1595 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ULC Act Demand for Entire Land Area Including Vacant Land — Demand Must Be Limited to Built-Up Area Only. The court held that under the repealed Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, a demand for payment cannot include vacant land as per the Section 20 Exemption Order Schedule.

9 Aug 2023

The petitioners challenged a demand of Rs 6,09,66,477 raised by the District Collector and Competent Authority under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regul...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Builders' Challenge to NMC's Refusal to Sanction Building Plans Based on Deemed Sanction Under Section 45(4) of MRTP Act. Court holds that failure to communicate objections within prescribed period results in deemed sanction, and subsequent refusal is invalid.

21 Apr 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s. Gowardhan Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Vedbhoomi Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. against t...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to Stone Crushers Act Reducing Distance from Dams. Court Holds Amendment Within Legislative Competence and Not Violative of Fundamental Rights.

5 Mar 2021

The petitioner, R. Anjaneya Reddy, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the Karnatak...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

10 Nov 2016

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

10 Nov 2016

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

High Court

KAHC010069912016_1

10 Nov 2016

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment Project in Colaba, Quashes Stop Work Notice Issued by MCGM Based on Defence Authority's Letter. NOC from Defence Authorities Not Required for Completion of Construction Under DCR 1991 as Height Restriction Under Works of Defence Act, 1903 Not Applicable to Building Height Below 30 Meters.

27 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Sea Kunal Corporation Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company, undertook redevelopment under the Development Control Regulations of 1991 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Land Owner's Consent Essential for Mode of Acquisition Under Section 126(1) MRTP Act — TDR Grant Requires Agreement, Not Unilateral Authority Action. The Court ruled that the option between monetary compensation and TDR under Section 126(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 is not solely with the acquiring authority but requires the consent of the land owner.

25 Jul 2022

This judgment arises from a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur, which disagreed with the view taken in Asha Sunil Z...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction on Municipal School Land — No Violation Found in Grant of IOD and Occupation Certificate. Court held that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality in the construction or deviation from sanctioned plans, and the PIL was dismissed with costs.

25 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Sanjay Krishna Chavan, claiming to be an RTI activist and social worker, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Interim Applications in Redevelopment Contract Dispute Between Developer and Partner. The Court Examines Injunctions Against Termination and Alienation of Property Under the Specific Relief Act.

27 Jun 2013

The plaintiff, Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913, filed Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay ...

44 45 46 47 48

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)