Search Results for "Central Public Works Department"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Central Public Works Department"

950 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 950 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals by Authority for Advance Rulings Against High Court Judgment Quashing AAR's Rejection of Treaty Benefits. Questions Raised on Taxation of Capital Gains Under India-Mauritius DTAA and Scope of Section 245R(2) Proviso (iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 1970

The disputes arose from applications for advance ruling filed by three Mauritius-incorporated companies—Tiger Global International II Holdings, Tige...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision and Dismisses Accused's Revision in Lokayukta Case — Sanction for Prosecution Required Before Taking Cognizance, Not Before Filing Charge Sheet. The court clarified that under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, sanction is a condition precedent for taking cognizance, not for filing charge sheet, and set aside the trial court's order directing the police to obtain sanction before filing charge sheet.

1 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal revision petitions: one filed by the State through Lokayukta Police, Gulbarga (Crl.RP No.659/2008) and another by the a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Directing Filing of Charge Sheet Without Sanction in Prevention of Corruption Act Case. Sanction for Prosecution Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is Mandatory Before Cognizance Can Be Taken by Special Judge.

1 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal revision petitions arising from an order dated 15.03.2008 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Gulbarga, in Special ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision and Dismisses Accused's Revision in Lokayukta Case — Sanction for Prosecution Under Prevention of Corruption Act Must Be Obtained Before Filing Charge Sheet. The court held that sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is a condition precedent for taking cognizance, not for filing charge sheet, and the Special Judge erred in directing the police to obtain sanction before filing charge sheet.

1 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal revision petitions: one filed by the State through Lokayukta Police, Gulbarga, and the other by the accused, Sadashiva ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Accused's Revision Petition in Prevention of Corruption Act Case — Order Directing Filing of Charge Sheet Without Sanction Set Aside. Sanction for prosecution under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is mandatory and cannot be dispensed with by the Special Judge.

1 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal revision petitions: one filed by the State through Lokayukta Police, Gulbarga, and the other by the accused, Sadashiva ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Tender Conditions for Sweeping Contract in Nashik Municipal Corporation — Net Worth and Experience Requirements Upheld. Court holds that Clause 3.2.2 and 3.4.2 of RFQ are not arbitrary or discriminatory and are justified for a long-term public hygiene contract.

20 Feb 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Watergrace Products, a proprietorship firm engaged in solid waste management, challenged certain conditions in a Request for Qual...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MTNL's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Favor of Contractor Despite Pending CBI Investigation. The court held that pendency of criminal investigation does not automatically justify stay of arbitration proceedings and that the award was not against public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Jul 2012

The Petitioner, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL), a Central Government Corporation, challenged an arbitral award dated 6 January 2009 passed by a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Divisional Commissioner Has No Jurisdiction Under Section 267A of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 to Set Aside Appointment of Anganwadi Sevika Made Under Integrated Child Development Scheme. The Commissioner's power under Section 267A is limited to appointments made under the Act and Rules, not to appointments under a Central Government Scheme like ICDS.

8 Nov 2019

The petitioner, Sangita Ulhas Gadilkar, was appointed as an Anganwadi Sevika under the Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS) by the Child Develop...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows MTNL's Challenge to Arbitral Award, Reduces Future Interest from 18% to 9%. Court upheld the arbitrator's findings on quantum but modified the future interest rate as excessive under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL), a Central Government Corporation, challenged an arbitral award dated 3 July 2006 passed by a so...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Banning Order Issued by Public Sector Undertaking – Allegations of Blacklisting Without Proper Notice and Violation of Fundamental Rights. Petitioner Contends That Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Intention to Ban for Three Years, Rendering Order Arbitrary.

27 Oct 2016

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a private limited company engaged in corrosion resistant coating applica...

43 44 45 46 47

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)