Search Results for "consumer protection rules 2020"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "consumer protection rules 2020"

182 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 182 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

1 Jan 2020

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Defendant in Commercial Suit to File Written Statement Despite Expiry of 120-Day Limit Due to COVID-19 Disruptions. Time Limit Under Proviso to Order VIII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as Substituted by Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Extended Considering Orders in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 and Administrative Curtailment of Court Functioning.

14 Feb 2022

The dispute arose from a commercial suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent against the defendant-appellant for recovery of Rs. 3,73,24,821/- with inte...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.

1 Jan 1970

The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Ruling That Time Limit Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act is Directory. The provision requiring District Magistrate to pass possession order within 30 days (extendable to 60 days) is directory, as non-compliance does not invalidate proceedings or prejudice the borrower.

1 Jan 2020

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that the time limit under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of ...

High Court

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Amendment to Rule 7(3) and Seniority List in Co-operative Banks. Petitioners Seek Declaration that G.O. and Seniority List are Ultra Vires and Violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

20 Feb 2025

The petitioners, employees of various District Central Co-operative Banks, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer and Purchaser's Appeals in Execution of Consumer Court Decree for Possession — Decree Not Conditional; Failure to Intimate Charges Prevents Default. Developer's Obligation to Inform Decree-Holder About MSEB Charges Within Fifteen Days Was Condition Precedent, and Non-Performance Meant Decree-Holder's Obligation to Pay Never Arose Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 47.

7 Feb 2020

This case involved the execution of a Consumer Court decree for possession of an immovable property. The decree-holder, a lady government servant, had...

High Court

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Amendment to Co-operative Societies Rules. Petitioners Seek Declaration that G.O. Miscellaneous No.11 and Seniority List are Ultra Vires Constitution.

20 Feb 2025

The matter comprised multiple writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Madras. The p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Issues Rule Nisi in Cyber Fraud Case Involving Unauthorized Withdrawals of Rs. 38.04 Lakh. Petitioner Claims Banks Breached RBI Guidelines on Internet Banking and Failed to Reverse Fraudulent Transactions.

6 Apr 2026

The petitioner, a freelancer in business consultancy, maintained savings and current accounts with HDFC Bank since 2011 and 2016 respectively. On 14 J...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Consumer Forum Orders Against Company in Liquidation — Jurisdiction of Consumer Forum Barred After Appointment of Official Liquidator Under Companies Act, 1956. The court held that once a winding up order is passed, the Company Court has exclusive jurisdiction over the company's assets, and the Consumer Forum cannot proceed without leave of the Company Court under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956.

29 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Sandhu, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa seeking to quash orders dated 17.10.2006, ...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)