Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Amendment to Rule 7(3) and Seniority List in Co-operative Banks. Petitioners Seek Declaration that G.O. and Seniority List are Ultra Vires and Violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, employees of various District Central Co-operative Banks, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the amendment to Rule 7(3) introduced by G.O. Miscellaneous No.11, Co-operation, Food and Consumer Protection Department, dated 24.01.2024, and the provisional seniority list dated 29.05.2024, are ultra vires and offend Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The petitioners contended that the impugned amendment and the seniority list adversely affect their service rights and seniority in the co-operative banking sector. The court heard the submissions of the petitioners' senior counsel and the Special Government Pleader for the respondents. No other factual or legal findings are available in the extracted text.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the amendment to Rule 7(3) vide G.O.Miscellaneous No.11 dated 24.01.2024 and the consequential provisional seniority list dated 29.05.2024 are ultra vires and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Constitutional validity of rule amendments and seniority lists
  • Articles 14 and 16
  • doctrine of ultra vires
  • maintainability of writ petitions under Article 226
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 159

W.P.Nos.22611, 16132, 21388, 21394, 21397, 22624, 21400, 22683, 22727, 25860 of 2024

2025-02-20

S.M. Subramaniam, K. Rajasekar

2025:MHC:489

Mr. V. Prakash, Mr. Gautam S. Raman, Mrs. M. Geetha Thamaraiselvan, Mr. P. Kannankumar, Mr. B. Gandhi

B. Gopalakrishnan, S. Parameswaran, S.S. Krishnamoorthy, M. Ravichandran, R. Gnanaskanthan, Mrs. N. Nirmala, Mr. Palanikumar, T. Ashok Kumar, P. Karmegam, Mr. N. Govindan, Mr. J. Arunachalam, Mrs. Udayakumari, Mr. K. Govindaraju

Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary, Co-operation, Food and Consumer Protection Department; The Registrar of Co-operative Societies; The Additional Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Finance and Banking, Common Cadre Authority; The Managing Director, Erode District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd; The Managing Director, Coimbatore District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd; The Managing Director, Chennai District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd; Mrs. Senthamarai A, Manager, Tiruchirappalli District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 challenging the validity of a rule amendment and a provisional seniority list in co-operative banks

Remedy Sought

Declaration that the amendment to Rule 7(3) vide G.O. Miscellaneous No.11 dated 24.01.2024 and the provisional seniority list dated 29.05.2024 are ultra vires and violate Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution

Filing Reason

The impugned amendment and seniority list allegedly affect the service rights and seniority of the petitioners

Issues

Whether the amendment to Rule 7(3) is ultra vires and violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India Whether the provisional seniority list is valid in light of the amendment

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 14, 16, 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Amendment to Rule 7(3) and Seniority List in Co-operative Banks. Petitioners Seek Declaration that G.O. and Seniority List are Ultra Vires and Violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of I...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Preventive Detention Orders Under PITNDPS Act — Detention Orders Quashed for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards. Failure to Communicate Grounds in Understandable Language and Delay in Considerin...