Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Amendment to Co-operative Societies Rules. Petitioners Seek Declaration that G.O. Miscellaneous No.11 and Seniority List are Ultra Vires Constitution.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter comprised multiple writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Madras. The petitioners, individuals holding posts in various District Central Co-operative Banks, sought a declaration that the amendment to Rule 7(3) of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rules, effected through G.O. Miscellaneous No.11 dated 24.01.2024, and the consequent provisional seniority list dated 29.05.2024 were ultra vires Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The respondents included the Government of Tamil Nadu represented by the Secretary, Co-operation, Food and Consumer Protection Department, the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, the Additional Registrar of Co-operative Societies/Chairman Common Cadre Authority, and Managing Directors of several District Central Co-operative Banks. Advocate V. Prakash appeared as senior counsel for the petitioners, while Special Government Pleader M. Geetha Thamaraiselvan represented the government respondents. No arguments or decision were recorded in the available text; the proceedings remained at the admission or initial hearing stage. The core grievance centred on the alleged violation of fundamental rights to equality in matters of public employment due to the impugned rule change and seniority list.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the amendment to Rule 7(3) and the consequent provisional seniority list are ultra vires Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 160

W.P.Nos.22611, 16132, 21388, 21394, 21397, 22624, 21400, 22683, 22727, 25860 of 2024

2025-02-20

S.M. Subramaniam, K. Rajasekar

V. Prakash (Senior Counsel for Gautam S. Raman), M. Geetha Thamaraiselvan, P. Kannankumar, B. Gandhi

B. Gopalakrishnan, S. Parameswaran, S.S. Krishnamoorthy, M. Ravichandran, R. Gnanaskanthan, N. Nirmala, Palanikumar, T. Ashok Kumar, P. Karmegam, N. Govindan, J. Arunachalam, Udayakumari, K. Govindaraju

Government of Tamil Nadu, Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Additional Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Managing Directors of Erode, Coimbatore, Chennai, Tiruchirappalli District Central Co-operative Banks, and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

Remedy Sought

Declaration that amendment to Rule 7(3) via G.O. Miscellaneous No.11, Cooperation Food and Consumer Protection Department dated 24.01.2024 and the consequent provisional seniority list dated 29.05.2024 are ultra vires Articles 14 and 16

Filing Reason

Alleged violation of fundamental rights to equality and equal opportunity in public employment

Issues

Whether the amendment to Rule 7(3) and the consequent provisional seniority list are ultra vires Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 14, 16, 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Bona Fide Passenger Despite Ticket Irregularity. Death of passenger due to fall from train held to be an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, and claima...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Promotion Quota Between Degree and Diploma Holders. Classification based on educational qualifications for promotion from Junior Engineer to Assistant Engineer is reasonable and not violative of Articl...