Search Results for "Section 354D IPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Section 354D IPC"

63 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 63 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 Quashed as Mechanical Exercise of Power Without Application of Mind.

3 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Sakir @ Bono Rustambhai Shekh, through his mother Habibabanu Rustambhai Shekh, challenged the legality and validity of a preventive de...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as order passed mechanically without application of mind.

3 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Arshit @ Lembo Najabhai Sankhat, through his father Najabhai Karshanbhai Sankhat, challenged the legality and validity of a preventive...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 quashed as mere registration of FIRs does not constitute a threat to public order.

2 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Suraj @Indo Rajubhai Sakarabhai Raval, was preventively detained by an order dated 23.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Ah...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention without evidence of threat to public order.

19 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Sanjaybhai @ Pilot Hamirbhai Chauhan, was preventively detained by an order dated 24.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Ahm...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. The court held that the detention order branding the detenue as a dangerous person under Section 2(c) of the Act was passed without application of mind and without any material indicating disturbance to public order.

16 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Mukeshbhai Vershibhai Desai, was preventively detained by an order dated 03.02.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad, b...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

10 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Ramjan @ Ramu S/o Shaheb @ Shaban Shah, was preventively detained by the Commissioner of Police, Surat City, under Section 2(c) of the...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

3 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Sumit @ Bali Vikrambhai Chunara, through his uncle Anil Dipakbhai Chunara, challenged the legality and validity of a preventive detent...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Section 164 Cr.P.C. Statement of Mentally Challenged Victim Recorded Without Proper Procedure — Directs Fresh Recording Under Section 164(5A) Cr.P.C. The court held that the Magistrate must follow the mandatory procedure under Section 164(5A) Cr.P.C. while recording the statement of a mentally challenged victim to ensure voluntariness and correctness.

23 Nov 2024

The petitioner, Sri. Somangouda S/o Mallangouda Patil, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Unnatural Sex and Sexual Assault on Minor Child Under POCSO Act — Police Witness Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 323, 377 IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act Sustained as Evidence of Police Officials Who Caught Accused Red-Handed Is Credible and Corroborated by Medical and FSL Reports.

30 Jan 2019

The appellant, Khalil Mehboob Shaikh, was convicted by the Designated Court under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, for offen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Case. Conviction Under Section 354 IPC and Section 7/8 POCSO Act Set Aside as Testimony of Child Witness and Uncle Found Unreliable.

21 Nov 2018

The appellant, Akhil Ismail Pinjari, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for offences under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code and...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)