Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as order passed mechanically without application of mind.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Arshit @ Lembo Najabhai Sankhat, through his father Najabhai Karshanbhai Sankhat, challenged the legality and validity of a preventive detention order dated 10.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Surat City, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985, classifying him as a 'dangerous person' under Section 2(c) of the Act. The detenue was detained in Bhuj Jail. The petitioner argued that there was no material before the detaining authority to indicate how public health, public order, or public tranquility was disturbed, and that the order was passed mechanically without application of mind. The respondent-State contended that the detenue was a habitual offender and his activities affected society at large, justifying the detention to prevent him from acting prejudicially. The court, after hearing both sides, found that the detention order was based solely on the detenue's antecedents and past activities, without any material showing a disturbance to public order. The court held that the order was passed mechanically and without application of mind, and therefore quashed the detention order, directing the detenue's release forthwith.

Headnote

A) Preventive Detention - Dangerous Person - Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 - Lack of Material - The detenue was preventively detained as a dangerous person. The court held that there was no material available with the detaining authority to indicate how public health, public order, or public tranquility was disturbed. The order was passed mechanically and without application of mind, hence quashed. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the preventive detention order passed against the detenue as a 'dangerous person' under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 is valid in the absence of material showing disturbance to public order or public tranquility.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the detention order dated 10.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Surat City, and directed the detenue to be released forthwith.

Law Points

  • Preventive detention
  • Dangerous person
  • Public order
  • Lack of material
  • Mechanical order
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 967

R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2162 of 2026

2026-03-03

N.S.Sanjay Gowda, D. M. Vyas

2026:GUJHC:16179-DB

MR. NAYAN N BARAIYA, MR. CHINTAN DAVE

Arshit @ Lembo S/o Najabhai Sankhat Thro Najbhai Karshanbhai Sankhat

State of Gujarat & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to preventive detention order under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985

Remedy Sought

Quashing of detention order and release of detenue

Filing Reason

Detenue was preventively detained as a dangerous person without material showing disturbance to public order

Issues

Whether the detention order was passed without material showing disturbance to public order or public tranquility Whether the order was passed mechanically and without application of mind

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that there was no material to indicate disturbance to public health, public order, or public tranquility; order passed mechanically. Respondent contended that detenue is habitual offender and his activities affected society at large, justifying detention.

Ratio Decidendi

Preventive detention under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 requires material showing disturbance to public order; mere antecedents and past activities without such material render the order invalid and mechanically passed.

Judgment Excerpts

there was no material available with the detention authority to indicate as to how the public health or public order or public tranquility was disturbed in any manner. the impugned order is passed without application of mind and prima facie the order is passed mechanically.

Procedural History

The detenue was preventively detained vide order dated 10.01.2026 by the Commissioner of Police, Surat City. He filed a Special Criminal Application through his father challenging the order. The court heard both sides and delivered judgment on 03.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985: 2(c)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Complaint Against Senior Manager in APMC Act Case — Petitioner Not a 'Trader' Under Section 2(48) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966. Purchase of Notified Produce for M...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as order passed mechanica...