Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Unnatural Sex and Sexual Assault on Minor Child Under POCSO Act — Police Witness Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 323, 377 IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act Sustained as Evidence of Police Officials Who Caught Accused Red-Handed Is Credible and Corroborated by Medical and FSL Reports.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 73
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Khalil Mehboob Shaikh, was convicted by the Designated Court under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, for offences punishable under Sections 323 and 377 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. The incident occurred on 14th February 2013 when police patrolling staff received information about suspicious persons on the terrace of a building in Railway Colony. Upon reaching the terrace, police officers P.W.1 Sujit Manohar Mone and others saw the appellant completely naked, committing an unnatural act on a minor boy who was also naked and crying. The appellant was apprehended on the spot. The victim, a 16-year-old orphan, was brought to Mumbai by his grandparents. The prosecution examined police witnesses, the victim (though he turned hostile), and medical evidence including an ossification test and FSL report. The trial court convicted the appellant, sentencing him to 10 years rigorous imprisonment under Section 377 IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act, and one year under Section 323 IPC. The appellant appealed against the conviction. The High Court upheld the conviction, finding the testimony of police witnesses credible and corroborated by medical evidence. The court noted that the victim's age was proved by ossification test and school records. The sentence was held not excessive given the gravity of the offence. The appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Unnatural Offences - Section 377 IPC - Conviction based on police witnesses - Testimony of police officials who caught the accused red-handed while committing unnatural act on a minor boy is credible and reliable, especially when corroborated by medical evidence and FSL report - Held that the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt (Paras 1-10)

B) Protection of Children from Sexual Offences - Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault - Section 6 POCSO Act - Age of victim - Victim's age determined as 16 years based on ossification test and school leaving certificate - Accused convicted for aggravated penetrative sexual assault - Sentence of 10 years RI upheld as not excessive (Paras 11-15)

C) Criminal Law - Hurt - Section 323 IPC - Minor injuries - Conviction for voluntarily causing hurt to the victim during the assault is sustainable (Para 1)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Sections 323, 377 IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act is sustainable based on the evidence of police witnesses and medical report

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence upheld.

Law Points

  • Conviction under Section 377 IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act can be based on testimony of police witnesses if credible and corroborated by medical evidence
  • Age of victim can be determined by ossification test and school records
  • Sentence of 10 years rigorous imprisonment is not excessive for aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a child
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (01) 80

Criminal Appeal No. 315 of 2014

2019-01-30

Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav

Mr. A.H.H. Ponda i/by Mr. Shailesh Kharat for the Appellant, Mr. S.S. Pednekar, APP for the State

Khalil Mehboob Shaikh

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for unnatural sex and sexual assault on a minor

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from the High Court

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by the trial court and sentenced to 10 years imprisonment

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant on 27th February 2014 in Sessions Case No. 464 of 2013

Issues

Whether the conviction based on testimony of police witnesses is sustainable Whether the age of the victim was proved as a minor Whether the sentence is excessive

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that police witnesses are interested witnesses and their testimony requires corroboration Prosecution argued that police witnesses are independent and their testimony is corroborated by medical evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The testimony of police officials who catch an accused red-handed while committing an offence is credible and reliable, especially when corroborated by medical and forensic evidence. The age of the victim can be determined by ossification test and school records. The sentence of 10 years for aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a child is not excessive.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant herein is convicted for offence punishable under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/ in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month. On the terrace, they saw that the victim (child) was denuded of all his clothes and the accused appellant was doing an unnatural act with the victim and sexually abusing him.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Designated Court under POCSO Act, Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No. 464 of 2013 on 27th February 2014. He filed Criminal Appeal No. 315 of 2014 before the Bombay High Court, which was heard and dismissed on 30th January 2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 323, 377
  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: 6
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition by Cultivating Tenant Against Eviction Order — Failure to Deposit Arrears of Rent Not a Ground for Eviction Under Puducherry Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1970. The court held that eviction cannot be...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Unnatural Sex and Sexual Assault on Minor Child Under POCSO Act — Police Witness Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 323, 37...