Search Results for "Section 148 Income Tax Act"

749 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 749 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Income Tax Reassessment Case Due to Change of Opinion. Reassessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be based on a mere change of opinion on the same facts already examined.

The petitioner, Knight Riders Sports Pvt. Ltd., which operates the Kolkata Knight Riders team in the Indian Premier League, challenged a notice dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasonable Belief and Change of Opinion. Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Proof of Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The petitioner, Vedanta Limited (formerly Sterlite Opportunities and Ventures Limited), challenged a notice dated 28 March 2008 issued under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Change of Opinion on Deduction Under Section 10AA of Income Tax Act, 1961 is Invalid.

The petitioner, Oracle Financial Services Software Limited, is a company engaged in providing information technology solutions to banks and financial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice and Assessment Order in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment under Section 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 invalid as based on same material already considered in original assessment under Section 143(3).

The petitioner, Pushpa Nahata, challenged a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 30 March 2022 and an assessment order dated 22 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessments Under Section 148 for Lack of Fresh Material — Deduction Under Section 80IB Allowed After Scrutiny in Original Assessment. Reopening Based on Same Facts Already Examined Under Section 143(3) Amounts to Change of Opinion and Is Invalid.

The petitioner, Purity Techtextile Private Limited, challenged the reopening of its income tax assessments for Assessment Years 2003-2004 and 2004-200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material — Interest on Refund Net of Interest Paid Under Section 220 Was Fully Disclosed During Original Assessment

The petitioner, Arthur Anderson & Co., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a notice dated 4 February 2009 issued b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Change of Opinion. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. Rabo India Finance Limited, a non-banking financial company, challenged a notice dated 28.3.2011 issued under Section 148 of the ...