Search Results for "development agreements"

1460 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1460 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Tax Demand Against Factory in Lump-Sum Contribution Dispute. Agreement for lump-sum contribution in lieu of taxes under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Rules, 1961 held binding on village panchayat, barring unilateral revision of tax.

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Ltd., a public limited company located within the territorial jurisdiction of Village Panchayat Jogeshwari, challenged a ta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considered Constitutional Challenge to Maharashtra Land Acquisition Amendment for Bullet Train Project. Petition Raised Questions of Repugnancy Under Article 254, Presidential Assent, Natural Justice, and Scope of Section 33 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013.

The litigation concerned a challenge to land acquisition for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail project, commonly called the Bullet Train Project. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision Setting Aside NCLT Orders Approving Resolution Plans for Earth Infrastructures Limited. Dispute Involves GNIDA's Claim Over Land Leased to Special Purpose Company and Its Subsidiaries, and the Validity of Resolution Plans Under IBC.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 30.01.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Agreement for Sale That Did Not Materialize Due to Market Downturn. Petitioner entitled to refund under Sections 47 and 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as instrument was not followed by conveyance and no fraud or misrepresentation was involved.

The Petitioner, M/s Shweta Infrastructure and Housing (I) Pvt. Ltd., entered into an agreement for sale on 29 September 2014 with the Khatib family fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against CIDCO's Revocation of Change of User Permission — Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel Applied Against Public Authority. CIDCO Cannot Revoke Permission After Allottee Acts Upon It to Its Detriment.

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Ambica Developers, a sole proprietorship of Mr. Madeva Patel, was allotted Plot No. 1 in Sector 1, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Interim Measures in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act, Citing Public Interest in Airport Development. Termination of Determinable Contract Not Stayed as Injunction Would Amount to Specific Performance Barred Under Specific Relief Act.

The case arose from a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Housing Development and Infrastructure Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes Public Interest Litigation with Directions to Enforce Tribal Land Transfer Restrictions. Section 36A of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, Prohibition 'or otherwise' Encompasses Development Agreements and Powers of Attorney to Prevent Alienation of Tribal Land.

Background: The petitioner, a registered tribal welfare organization, filed this Public Interest Litigation raising concern over illegal transfers of ...