Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision Setting Aside NCLT Orders Approving Resolution Plans for Earth Infrastructures Limited. Dispute Involves GNIDA's Claim Over Land Leased to Special Purpose Company and Its Subsidiaries, and the Validity of Resolution Plans Under IBC.

  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 30.01.2023, which set aside three orders of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) approving resolution plans for Earth Infrastructures Limited (EIL), the corporate debtor. The background involves the initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) against EIL under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), following an application by a financial creditor, Deepak Khanna. Prior to the CIRP, the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA) had allotted land to a consortium comprising EIL, Raus Infras Limited, and Shalini Holdings Limited, which formed a special purpose company (SPC), Earth Towne Infrastructures Private Limited (ETIPL), to develop the land. Lease deeds were executed for three plots: one to ETIPL for a residential project named 'Earth Towne', and two to subsidiaries of EIL (Neo Multimedia Limited and Nishtha Software Private Limited) for IT projects named 'Earth TechOne' and 'Earth Sapphire Court'. EIL was to undertake development on all three plots. The NCLT admitted the CIRP against EIL on 06.06.2018, and the Committee of Creditors (CoC) was constituted, comprising HDFC Bank and 4,229 allottees. The resolution professional invited expression of interest and received resolution plans. The NCLT approved resolution plans submitted by Roma Unicon Designex Consortium (Roma) and Alpha Corp Development Private Limited (Alpha) for different projects. GNIDA challenged these approvals before the NCLAT, which set aside the NCLT orders. Aggrieved, various parties including Alpha, Roma, EIL, homebuyers' associations, and GNIDA itself filed appeals before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court first addressed the issue of delay in filing certain appeals, noting that under Section 62(2) of the IBC, delay beyond 15 days cannot be condoned. The appeals filed by Earth Property Buyers Association under Civil Appeal (Diary) No. 19132 of 2023 were delayed by 34 days and were dismissed as barred by time. The Court then proceeded to consider the merits of the remaining appeals, focusing on the validity of the resolution plans and the rights of GNIDA over the leased land. The judgment is ongoing, with the Court having directed status quo on 13.04.2023.

Headnote

A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code - Limitation for Appeal - Section 62(2) - Condonation of Delay - Appeals filed under Section 62 of the IBC, 2016, must be filed within 30 days, and delay beyond 15 days cannot be condoned - The Supreme Court held that appeals filed with a delay of 34 days are barred by time and dismissed on this ground (Para 4).

B) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code - Resolution Plan Approval - Rights of Allottees - Sections 7, 13, 30, 31 - The NCLT had approved resolution plans for the corporate debtor, Earth Infrastructures Limited, but the NCLAT set aside those orders - The Supreme Court considered the validity of the resolution plans in the context of GNIDA's claims over land leased to the corporate debtor's subsidiaries and special purpose company (Paras 1-3, 6-12).

C) Land Law - Lease Deed - Consortium Agreement - Special Purpose Company - Clause 8 of Builders Scheme - The lease deed for the plot was executed in favor of the special purpose company, Earth Towne Infrastructures Private Limited, with conditions regarding shareholding and development rights - The Supreme Court noted the terms of the lease and the development agreement between the special purpose company and the corporate debtor (Paras 6-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the NCLAT was correct in setting aside the NCLT orders approving resolution plans for Earth Infrastructures Limited, and whether the appeals filed by various parties are maintainable, particularly in light of delay in filing.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed under Civil Appeal (Diary) No. 19132 of 2023 as barred by time under Section 62(2) of the IBC. The remaining appeals were considered on merits, but the judgment is ongoing with status quo directed on 13.04.2023.

Law Points

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
  • Section 62
  • Limitation for appeal
  • Condonation of delay
  • Corporate insolvency resolution process
  • Resolution plan approval
  • Rights of allottees
  • Land lease disputes
  • Special purpose company
  • Consortium agreement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (SC) (05) 4

Civil Appeal No. 1526 of 2023 with C.A. No. 1743 of 2023 C.A. No. 2491 of 2023 C.A. No. 2466 of 2023 C.A. Nos. 2406-2407 of 2023 C.A. No. 3438 of 2023 C.A. Nos. 3435-3437 of 2023 C.A. No. 2756 of 2023 C.A. No. 2763 of 2023 C.A. No. 4619 of 2023 and C.A.(Diary) No. 19132 of 2023

2026-03-05

SANJAY KUMAR J. , ALOK ARADHE J.

2026 INSC 449

Alpha Corp Development Private Limited and others

Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA) and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeals under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, challenging the NCLAT judgment setting aside NCLT orders approving resolution plans for the corporate debtor.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside the NCLAT judgment and restore the NCLT orders approving resolution plans.

Filing Reason

The NCLAT set aside NCLT orders approving resolution plans for Earth Infrastructures Limited, aggrieving various parties including resolution applicants, the corporate debtor, homebuyers' associations, and GNIDA.

Previous Decisions

NCLT approved resolution plans by Roma and Alpha on 05.04.2021 and 08.06.2021 respectively; NCLAT set aside these orders on 30.01.2023.

Issues

Whether the NCLAT was correct in setting aside the NCLT orders approving resolution plans. Whether the appeals filed by Earth Property Buyers Association are barred by limitation under Section 62(2) of the IBC. Whether GNIDA's claims over the leased land affect the validity of the resolution plans.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the NCLAT erred in setting aside the NCLT orders approving resolution plans. GNIDA contended that the resolution plans did not adequately address its claims over the land and that the NCLT orders were flawed. Earth Property Buyers Association sought to challenge the NCLAT judgment but was barred by delay.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 62(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, an appeal to the Supreme Court must be filed within 30 days, and delay beyond 15 days cannot be condoned. Appeals filed with a delay of 34 days are barred by time and must be dismissed.

Judgment Excerpts

Section 62(2) of the Code empowers this Court to condone delay in filing up to 15 days but not more. These appeals are, thus, clearly barred by time and cannot be entertained. The ostensible genesis of this litigation is the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) initiated by one Deepak Khanna, a financial creditor, against Earth Infrastructures Limited (EIL), the CD, vide Company Petition IB-401(ND)/2017, under Section 7 of the Code.

Procedural History

CIRP initiated against EIL on 06.06.2018. NCLT approved resolution plans on 05.04.2021 (Roma) and 08.06.2021 (Alpha). NCLAT set aside these orders on 30.01.2023. Appeals filed before Supreme Court in 2023. Status quo directed on 13.04.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 7, Section 13, Section 30, Section 31, Section 62
  • Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976: Section 3
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Court Quashes FIR in Marriage Cheating Case, Allows Civil Remedy. Court rules lack of criminal intent in elopement case, quashes FIR under Section 420 IPC, reserves liberty for civil action.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision Setting Aside NCLT Orders Approving Resolution Plans for Earth Infrastructures Limited. Dispute Involves GNIDA's Claim Over Land Leased to Special Purpose Company and Its Subsidiaries, and the Validity of Resoluti...