High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Repayment of Loans in Cash Not Violative of Section 269T Where Loans Were Not Taken by Assessee. The court held that Section 269T applies only to repayment of loans taken by the assessee, not to repayment of advances received from others.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Revenue appealed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore, which had set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty was originally imposed by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 2005-06. The brief facts are that the respondent assessee had repaid certain advances/loans in cash to M/s Annapoorneshwari Investments (AI) and M/s Adarsh Enterprises (AE) amounting to Rs.14.6 crores and Rs.0.12 crores respectively. According to the Revenue, this repayment in cash violated Section 269T of the Act. A notice dated 20.6.2008 was issued to the assessee to explain why penalty under Section 271E should not be imposed. The assessee contended that the amounts repaid were not loans taken by the assessee but were advances received from AI and AE, and thus Section 269T did not apply. The Tribunal accepted this contention and set aside the penalty. The High Court, after hearing the parties, held that Section 269T applies only to repayment of loans or deposits taken by the assessee. Since the advances repaid were not loans taken by the assessee, there was no violation of Section 269T, and consequently, no penalty under Section 271E could be imposed. The court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the Tribunal's order.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Penalty under Section 271E - Repayment of Advances - Section 269T, Section 271E, Income Tax Act, 1961 - The issue was whether repayment of advances in cash by the assessee to third parties, which were not loans taken by the assessee, attracts penalty under Section 271E for violation of Section 269T. The court held that Section 269T applies only to repayment of loans or deposits taken by the assessee, and not to repayment of advances received from others. Since the advances were not loans taken by the assessee, no penalty could be imposed. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the repayment of advances/loans in cash by the assessee to M/s Annapoorneshwari Investments and M/s Adarsh Enterprises, which were not loans taken by the assessee but advances received from them, attracts penalty under Section 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for violation of Section 269T.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that Section 269T applies only to repayment of loans or deposits taken by the assessee. Since the advances repaid were not loans taken by the assessee, there was no violation of Section 269T, and no penalty under Section 271E could be imposed. The order of the Tribunal was affirmed.

Law Points

  • Section 269T applies only to repayment of loans or deposits taken by the assessee
  • not to repayment of advances received from others
  • Penalty under Section 271E cannot be imposed for repayment of advances that were not loans taken by the assessee
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (08) 15

Income Tax Appeal 382/2009

2015-08-18

Vineet Saran, B Manohar

K V Aravind (for appellants), S Parthasarathi (for respondent)

Commissioner of Income Tax, Mysore and Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore

M/s Canara Housing Development Company, Bangalore

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal by Revenue against Tribunal order setting aside penalty under Section 271E of Income Tax Act, 1961.

Remedy Sought

Revenue sought to set aside the Tribunal order and confirm the penalty imposed by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax.

Filing Reason

Revenue contended that the assessee violated Section 269T by repaying advances/loans in cash, warranting penalty under Section 271E.

Previous Decisions

Additional Commissioner of Income Tax imposed penalty under Section 271E; Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed the penalty; Income Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside the penalty.

Issues

Whether repayment of advances in cash by the assessee to third parties, which were not loans taken by the assessee, attracts penalty under Section 271E for violation of Section 269T of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Submissions/Arguments

Revenue argued that the repayment of advances in cash violated Section 269T and thus penalty under Section 271E was justified. Assessee contended that the amounts repaid were not loans taken by the assessee but advances received from AI and AE, and therefore Section 269T did not apply.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 269T of the Income Tax Act, 1961 applies only to repayment of loans or deposits taken by the assessee. Repayment of advances received from others does not attract the provisions of Section 269T, and consequently, no penalty under Section 271E can be imposed for such repayment.

Judgment Excerpts

The brief facts relevant for the purpose of this case are that for the assessment year 2005-06, respondent assessee had repaid certain advances/loans to M/s Annapoorneshwari Investments and M/s Adarsh Enterprises in cash which was to the tune of Rs.14.6 crores and 0.12 crores respectively which, according to the appellant - Revenue, was in violation of the provisions of section 269 T of the Act. Notice dated 20.6.2008 was thus issued to the respondent assessee to explain why penalty under section 271 E of the Act should not be imposed.

Procedural History

The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax imposed penalty under Section 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2005-06. The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who confirmed the penalty. The assessee then appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore, which set aside the penalty. The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Act before the High Court of Karnataka, which dismissed the appeal on 18.8.2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 269T, 271E, 260A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Repayment of Loans in Cash Not Violative of Section 269T Where Loans Were Not Taken by Assessee. The court held that Section 269T applies only to repayment of loans taken...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Commercial Court Order on Arbitration Time Extension Application. Commercial Court Erred in Declining Jurisdiction Over Section 29A Application Based on Arbitrator Appointment Method Under Arbitration and C...