KAHC010306442014_1
10 Mar 2016...
Search Results for "private party"
6738 result(s) found
Found 6738 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Petitioners Challenge Notifications and Awards Under Bangalore Development Authority Act Asserting Lapse Under Section 24 of 2013 Act.
10 Mar 2016The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed between 2013 and 2015 by multiple landowners against the State of Karna...
- 63
High Court
- 78
High Court
- 14
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Seeking Declaration that Land Acquisition Proceedings Have Lapsed Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Multiple petitioners challenged notifications and sought relief under Section 24 of the 2013 Act in connection with acquisitions by Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority.
10 Mar 2016Multiple writ petitions were filed by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Bangalore Development Authority and...
- 65
High Court
- 57
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions on Lapsing of Land Acquisition Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Land Acquisition Proceedings Challenged for Non-Compliance with Provisions of the New Land Acquisition Law.
10 Mar 2016The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various landowners against the State of Karnataka, the Mysore Urban ...
- 71
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal of Bidder in Tender Rejection for Battery Energy Storage Project — Appellant's Bid Properly Rejected as Non-Responsive. Non-Furnishing of Affiliate Undertaking as Required by Clause 37.3 of RfS Justified Rejection and No Violation of Natural Justice Found.
20 Jul 2026The appeal arose from a writ petition challenging the rejection of a bid submitted in response to a Request for Selection (RfS) for a Battery Energy S...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 145 CrPC Proceedings in Multi-Party Disputes and Successive Orders. The court held that Section 145 CrPC applies to disputes involving more than two parties and that successive orders are permissible if fresh material shows a new apprehension of breach of peace.
25 Nov 2010The case involves a group of writ petitions and intervention applications challenging the validity of proceedings under Section 145 of the Code of Cri...
- 171
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order on Non-Arbitrability. Disputes Relating to Termination for Convenience and Non-Compete Obligations Held Not Arbitrable Under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
30 Jun 2026The petitioner, Capalpha Trade Private Limited, filed a commercial arbitration petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...
- 36
