High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions on Lapsing of Land Acquisition Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Land Acquisition Proceedings Challenged for Non-Compliance with Provisions of the New Land Acquisition Law.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various landowners against the State of Karnataka, the Mysore Urban Development Authority, and the Bangalore Development Authority. The petitioners challenged land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act and the Bangalore Development Authority Act. They sought declarations that the acquisitions had lapsed by operation of Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The prayers included quashing of notifications and awards, and in some cases, issuance of no-objection certificates. The matters were consolidated and argued by senior advocates representing the petitioners and the respondents, including the Advocate General. The court's judgment was delivered on 10 March 2016 by Justice Anand Byrareddy. However, the provided text does not contain the court's reasoning or final decision.

Issue of Consideration

Whether land acquisition proceedings have lapsed by virtue of Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (KAR) (03) 34

W.P. Nos.38868-38870 of 2015, W.P. Nos.38871-38874 of 2015, W.P. Nos.35858 and 35880-35881 of 2013, W.P. No.82 of 2015, W.P. Nos.26980-26982 of 2015, W.P. No.83 of 2015, W.P. Nos.15616-15620 of 2013, and W.P. No.40076 of 2014 (LA-UDA & LA-BDA)

2016-03-10

Anand Byrareddy

L. Nageshwara Rao, Senior Advocate for B.L. Sanjeev; V. Lakshminarayana, Senior Advocate for Vikram Balaji B.L.; Ashok Haranahalli, Senior Advocate for Manmohan P.N.; S.M. Chandrashekhar, Senior Advocate for T.R. Ramesh; C.M. Nagabhushan for Rajeswara P.N. and H.R. Narayana Rao; Advocate General Madhusudhan R Naik; S. Vijay Shankar, Senior Advocate for respondents

Smt. K.M. Chikkathayamma & Others; Smt. Shivamma & Others; Sri. Viswanatha Reddy & Others; Sri. M. Jagadish; Narasimha Reddy .N & Others; Smt. T.K. Shilpashree; Sri. Ramachandra & Others; Sri. L. Chandrashekar & Others

The State of Karnataka, Mysore Urban Development Authority, Bangalore Development Authority, Special Land Acquisition Officers

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil writ petitions challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by urban development authorities, seeking declaration of lapse under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners (landowners) sought declaration that acquisition proceedings had lapsed; quashing of awards and notifications; and issuance of no-objection certificates.

Filing Reason

Alleged failure to complete acquisition proceedings, including taking possession and paying compensation, within the timeline under the new land acquisition law.

Issues

Whether the land acquisition proceedings have lapsed by operation of Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, due to non-compliance with provisions regarding possession and compensation.

Procedural History

Multiple writ petitions were filed by various landowners before the High Court of Karnataka challenging land acquisition proceedings under the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act and Bangalore Development Authority Act. The petitioners sought to declare that the acquisitions had lapsed under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The petitions were consolidated and heard together.

Acts & Sections

  • Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013: Section 24
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: Section 17(1), Section 19(1)
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions on Lapsing of Land Acquisition Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Land Acquisition Proceedings Challenged for Non-Compliance with Provisions of the New Land Acquisition Law...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Rejection of Plaint, Holds Appeal Lies Under Section 96 CPC. Rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC is a decree under Section 2(2) CPC and appealable under Section 96 CPC, not subject to writ j...