Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition Proceedings Under 2013 Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Compliance with Provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-10-15 16:57:47
  • 66
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010403472015_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (KAR) (03) 11

Writ Petition Nos.38868-38870 of 2015 and connected matters

2016-03-10

Anand Byrareddy

L. Nageshwara Rao, B.L. Sanjeev, V. Lakshminarayana, Vikram Balaji B.L., Shilpa Rani, C.M. Nagabhushan, Rajeswara P.N., H.R. Narayana Rao, Ashok Haranahalli, Manmohan P.N., S.M. Chandrashekhar, Ramesh T.R., Madhusudhan R Naik, Laxminarayana, D. Nagaraja, S. Vijay Shankar, T.P. Vivekananda, K. Krishna, C.R.G.

K.M. Chikkathayamma and Others (in WP 38868-70/2015), Shivamma and Others (in WP 38871-74/2015), Viswanatha Reddy and Others (in WP 35858/2013), M. Jagadish (WP 82/2015), Narasimha Reddy and Others (WP 26980-82/2015), T.K. Shilpashree (WP 83/2015), Ramachandra and Others (WP 15616-20/2013), L. Chandrashekar and Another (WP 40076/2014)

State of Karnataka, Urban Development Department; Mysore Urban Development Authority; Bangalore Development Authority; Special Land Acquisition Officers

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking declaration that land acquisition proceedings had lapsed.

Remedy Sought

Declaration that land acquisition proceedings for the schedule lands had lapsed by virtue of Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013; also quashing of notifications in some petitions.

Filing Reason

The petitioners claimed that the conditions under Section 24 of the 2013 Act for lapsing of acquisition proceedings were met, as compensation had not been paid or possession not taken.

Issues

Whether the land acquisition proceedings initiated under the BDA Act or other applicable acts have lapsed in terms of Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
  • Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013: Section 24
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: Sections 17(1), 19(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
land acquisition lapsing writ petition urban development authority compensation rehabilitation and resettlement

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Deceased Government Employee with Agricultural Income. Compensation Enhanced by Reassessing Income, Future Prospects, and Conventional Heads Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. 2026-11-02 12:06:05
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Party Challenge to Lok Adalat Award in Partition Suit — No Right to Challenge Without Being Party to Compromise. Petitioners, who were not parties to the compromise in Regular Civil Suit No.730/2017, cannot challen... 2026-11-02 12:06:00
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition murder natural justice acquittal compensation burden of proof land acquisition limitation Jurisdiction Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in IPC Sections 376, 420, 493, 494, and 495 Case...

Supreme Court Restores Appellate Tribunal's Order on Tariff Determination Due to Breach of...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to High Court Orders in Civil Appeal — Legal...

Lost Your Password?