Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

KAHC010306442014_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-08-03 02:28:48
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010306442014_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (KAR) (03) 5

WRIT PETITION Nos.38868-38870 OF 2015 (LA-UDA)

2016-03-10

Anand Byrareddy

L. Nageshwara Rao, B.L. Sanjeev, Madhusudhan R Naik, Laxminarayana, D. Nagaraja, S. Vijay Shankar, T.P. Vivekananda

K.M. Chikkathayamma, R. Krishna, R. Hema, Parimala, R. Umesha, T. Renuka, T. Preethi, P. Kiran, P. Santosh, P. Sunil

The State of Karnataka, Urban Development Department; The Mysore Urban Development Authority; The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Mysore Urban Development Authority

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Land acquisition proceedings challenged, seeking declaration of lapse under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought declaration that the land acquisition proceedings have lapsed by virtue of the 2013 Act, and quashing of awards/notifications

Filing Reason

Petitioners alleged non-compliance with provisions of the 2013 Act leading to deemed lapse of acquisition

Issues

Whether the land acquisition proceedings initiated under the BDA Act and UDA Act have lapsed by virtue of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013?

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the land acquisition proceedings and seeking declaration of lapse under the 2013 Act. The petitions were taken up together and heard by the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013: Section 24
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act: Section 17(1), Section 19(1)
  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
land acquisition lapse Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition BDA UDA Mysore Urban Development Authority Bangalore Development Authority preliminary notification final notification award compensation

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court KAHC010306442014_1 2026-08-03 02:28:48
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court's Acquittal Under POCSO Act, Restores Conviction for Sexual Assault Without Skin-to-Skin Contact Requirement. The Court held that 'sexual assault' under Section 7 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences ... 2026-08-03 02:28:47
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition acquittal natural justice murder compensation burden of proof limitation benefit of doubt Article 226 Land Acquisition
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alienations and...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Championship L...

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Ch...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Decrees in Malankara Church Disputes. Rival...

Supreme Court Directs State Governments to Implement National Food Security Act, 2013 Mand...

Lost Your Password?