HomeJudgement

Scroll Down To Discover

High Court

KAHC010306442014_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU

Admin

2026-10-24 20:25:02

Font size:

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010306442014_1

Case Details

2016 LawText (KAR) (03) 5

WRIT PETITION Nos.38868-38870 OF 2015 (LA-UDA)

2016-03-10

Anand Byrareddy

L. Nageshwara Rao, B.L. Sanjeev, Madhusudhan R Naik, Laxminarayana, D. Nagaraja, S. Vijay Shankar, T.P. Vivekananda

K.M. Chikkathayamma, R. Krishna, R. Hema, Parimala, R. Umesha, T. Renuka, T. Preethi, P. Kiran, P. Santosh, P. Sunil

The State of Karnataka, Urban Development Department; The Mysore Urban Development Authority; The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Mysore Urban Development Authority

Nature of Litigation

Land acquisition proceedings challenged, seeking declaration of lapse under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought declaration that the land acquisition proceedings have lapsed by virtue of the 2013 Act, and quashing of awards/notifications

Filing Reason

Petitioners alleged non-compliance with provisions of the 2013 Act leading to deemed lapse of acquisition

Issues

Whether the land acquisition proceedings initiated under the BDA Act and UDA Act have lapsed by virtue of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013?

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the land acquisition proceedings and seeking declaration of lapse under the 2013 Act. The petitions were taken up together and heard by the High Court.

Acts & Sections

Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013: Section 24
Bangalore Development Authority Act: Section 17(1), Section 19(1)
Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 227

One-Time Download (₹149 ₹99) Get Subscription

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases, Reduces Enhanced Compensation. Court holds that additional market value under Section 23(1A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 cannot be awarded without eviden... 2026-11-01 18:15:28

High Court Madras High Court Allows Appeal in RERA Case for Delay in Possession — Promoter Liable for Interest Under Section 18 of RERA Act, 2016. The court restored the order of TN RERA directing the promoter to pay interest for delay in handing over possess... 2026-11-01 18:15:26

KAHC010306442014_1

Issue of Consideration

Case Details

Nature of Litigation

Remedy Sought

Filing Reason

Issues

Procedural History

Acts & Sections

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in IPC Sections 376, 420, 493, 494, and 495 Case...

Supreme Court Restores Appellate Tribunal's Order on Tariff Determination Due to Breach of...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to High Court Orders in Civil Appeal — Legal...