Search Results for "block development officer"

1302 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1302 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 35(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Gramsevak's Failure to Convene Meeting Within 15 Days Renders Motion Void.

The petitioner, Sow. Gangabai Vithal Bade, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Hadoli. Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 submitted a requisition for a no-confidenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch for Violation of Natural Justice. Order Passed Without Notice or Hearing Under Section 7 of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 Set Aside.

The petitioner, Nanasaheb s/o Dhondiram Mundhe, was the Sarpanch of village Khandali, Taluka Gangakhed, District Parbhani. He challenged an order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in Tender Misconduct Case — Enquiry Vitiated by Violation of Natural Justice. Order under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act set aside for lack of fair opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and consider defence.

The petitioner, Sau. Leena Ramesh Dongarwar, was the Sarpanch of Navegaon Bandh Gram Panchayat. She was removed from office by an order of the Deputy ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Act Applicability to Cooperative Banks and Arbitration Awards. Multi-State Cooperative Bank held to be a 'bank' under SARFAESI Act, and arbitration under Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act does not bar subsequent SARFAESI proceedings.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by borrowers challenging actions taken by Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank Ltd. and Piramal Capital and Ho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Excess Payment Case — Recovery from Pension Without Opportunity of Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Recovery of Rs.1,35,513/- from pension of retired Extension Officer set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Dattatraya s/o Kalu Patil, was appointed as Extension Officer (Statistics) by the Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon on 19.10.1994. He was grante...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Multiple Writ Petitions on Land Acquisition Lapse. Petitioners contend that acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Sections 24, 25 of the 2013 Act due to non-making of award within prescribed period.

These writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition proceedings. The petitioners, who...