Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Excess Payment Case — Recovery from Pension Without Opportunity of Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Recovery of Rs.1,35,513/- from pension of retired Extension Officer set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 223
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dattatraya s/o Kalu Patil, was appointed as Extension Officer (Statistics) by the Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon on 19.10.1994. He was granted higher pay scale and increments as per government policy. Upon his retirement on 31.05.2018, the respondent no.5 forwarded his pension proposal. However, the respondent no.3 passed an order dated 11.06.2018 recovering Rs.1,35,513/- from his pension towards alleged excess payment. The petitioner challenged this recovery order and the earlier order dated 15.01.2018 passed by the Block Development Officer. The court noted that the recovery was made without any show-cause notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The respondents argued that the recovery was based on audit objections and that the petitioner had given an undertaking. However, the court found that no such undertaking was on record. The court held that recovery from pension without affording an opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice. The court quashed the recovery order dated 11.06.2018 and directed the respondents to refund the recovered amount within four weeks. The court also clarified that if the respondents wish to recover the amount, they may issue a show-cause notice and proceed in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Recovery of Excess Payment - Natural Justice - Recovery from pension without prior notice and opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice - The petitioner, a retired Extension Officer, was sought to be recovered Rs.1,35,513/- from his pension without any show-cause notice - Held that such recovery without affording opportunity of hearing is unsustainable and quashed (Paras 4-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the recovery of excess payment from the pension of a retired employee without giving any opportunity of hearing is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The order dated 11.06.2018 passed by respondent no.3 is quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to refund the recovered amount of Rs.1,35,513/- to the petitioner within four weeks. If the respondents wish to recover the amount, they may issue a show-cause notice and proceed in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Recovery of excess payment from pension without prior notice and opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice
  • Recovery from retired employees requires show-cause notice and opportunity
  • No recovery if excess payment was not due to misrepresentation by employee
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (10) 250

WRIT PETITION NO. 2754 OF 2019

2025-10-01

R.G. AVACHAT, ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

2025:BHC-AUG:28352-DB

Ms. Deepali Nikalje h/f Mr. Ajay G. Talhar, Advocate for Petitioner, Ms. R.P. Gaur, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2/State, Mr. M.S. Sonawane, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 to 6

Dattatraya s/o Kalu Patil

The State of Maharashtra, The Divisional Commissioner, The Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon, The Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon Through its Deputy Chief Executive Officer, The Chief Account and Finance Officer Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon, The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Erandol

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India challenging recovery of excess payment from pension.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of order dated 11.06.2018 recovering Rs.1,35,513/- from his pension and order dated 15.01.2018 passed by Block Development Officer.

Filing Reason

Recovery of Rs.1,35,513/- from pension without any show-cause notice or opportunity of hearing.

Issues

Whether the recovery of excess payment from pension without opportunity of hearing is sustainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that recovery was made without any show-cause notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. Respondents argued that recovery was based on audit objections and petitioner had given an undertaking, but no undertaking was on record.

Ratio Decidendi

Recovery of excess payment from pension without affording an opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained.

Judgment Excerpts

It is not in dispute that before passing the impugned order dated 11.06.2018, no show cause notice was issued to the petitioner nor any opportunity of hearing was given to him. The recovery of the amount from the pension of the petitioner without giving any opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 2754 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the recovery order dated 11.06.2018 and the order dated 15.01.2018. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 01.10.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Court Upholds PMC's Demolition Notices for Illegal Green Belt Constructions in Pune. Petitioners' Plea for Regularization Rejected; Costs Imposed for Violations of Environmental Regulations
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Injunction in Property Dispute — Prima Facie Case Established for Temporary Injunction. The court set aside the trial court's order and remanded for fresh consideration of the injunction appli...