Case Note & Summary
The petitioner, Sow. Gangabai Vithal Bade, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Hadoli. Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 submitted a requisition for a no-confidence motion against her. The Gramsevak (Respondent No. 3) failed to convene the meeting within the mandatory 15-day period under Section 35(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Instead, the meeting was held later, and the motion was passed. The petitioner challenged the validity of the motion on the ground that the Gramsevak did not perform his statutory duty. The court held that the Gramsevak's failure to convene the meeting within the prescribed period rendered the no-confidence motion invalid. The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the motion, and directed the respondents to restore the petitioner as Sarpanch.
Headnote
A) Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 - No-confidence motion against Sarpanch - Section 35(1)(b) - Gramsevak's duty to convene meeting - The Gramsevak is obligated to convene a meeting within 15 days of receiving the requisition; failure to do so renders the subsequent motion invalid. (Paras 3-5)
B) Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 - No-confidence motion - Quorum and notice - The motion must be passed with the requisite quorum and proper notice; non-compliance vitiates the motion. (Paras 4-5)
C) Writ jurisdiction - High Court can interfere when statutory provisions are violated and the motion is passed without jurisdiction. (Para 5)
Issue of Consideration
Whether the no-confidence motion passed against the petitioner Sarpanch was valid when the Gramsevak failed to convene the meeting within the statutory period and the motion was passed without proper notice and quorum.
Final Decision
The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the no-confidence motion, and directed the respondents to restore the petitioner as Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Hadoli.
Law Points
- No-confidence motion against Sarpanch
- Gramsevak's duty to convene meeting
- Section 35(1)(b) Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act
- 1959
- Quorum requirement
- Notice period
- Validity of motion
Case Details
2012 LawText (BOM) (12) 8
Writ Petition No. 4235 of 2012
Mr. R.K. Ashtekar for petitioner, Mr. D.V. Tele (A.G.P.) for respondent Nos. 1 & 2, Mr. R.S. Deshmukh h/f Mr. D.M. Hange for respondent Nos. 4 to 6
Sow. Gangabai Vithal Bade
The State of Maharashtra, The Collector, The Gramsevak, Sow. Mahananda w/o. Chankarrao Chate, Shri Baliram s/o. Dashrath Chikte, Vinod s/o. Shankarrao Chate
Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more)
Subscribe Now
Nature of Litigation
Writ petition challenging the validity of a no-confidence motion passed against the petitioner Sarpanch.
Remedy Sought
Petitioner sought quashing of the no-confidence motion and restoration as Sarpanch.
Filing Reason
The Gramsevak failed to convene the meeting within the statutory period of 15 days as required under Section 35(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.
Issues
Whether the no-confidence motion against the petitioner was valid when the Gramsevak did not convene the meeting within 15 days of receiving the requisition.
Submissions/Arguments
Petitioner argued that the Gramsevak failed to perform his statutory duty to convene the meeting within 15 days, rendering the motion invalid.
Respondents argued that the motion was passed in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi
Under Section 35(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, the Gramsevak is duty-bound to convene a meeting for a no-confidence motion within 15 days of receiving the requisition. Failure to do so renders the motion invalid and without jurisdiction.
Judgment Excerpts
As per order passed in L.P.A.No. 215 of 2012, I heard the submissions of both the learned Counsel appearing for the parties.
The Gramsevak did not convene the meeting within 15 days as required under Section 35(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.
In my view, the Gramsevak failed to perform his statutory duty. Hence, the no-confidence motion passed against the petitioner is invalid.
Procedural History
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 4235 of 2012 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The matter was heard after an order in L.P.A. No. 215 of 2012. The court allowed the petition on 14.12.2012.
Acts & Sections
- Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959: Section 35(1)(b)
