Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966"

679 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 679 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Land Used for Development Plan Road in Pune. Land Not a Public Street Under Section 224 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, Hence Society Entitled to Consideration for TDR.

The petitioner, Shri Chhatrapati Rajaram Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., owned land bearing Survey No.682/A at Bibavewadi, Pune. A layout plan was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Parking Space Regulations Under UDCPR in Navi Mumbai. Court holds that UDCPR provisions are statutory and binding, and that the petitioner failed to demonstrate any illegality or public interest violation.

The petitioner, Sandeep Thakur, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging the parking space regulations under the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Dispute over lease rights and possession under Town Planning Scheme III, Mahim Division.

Property Dispute in Mumbai: Leasehold Rights and Reconstitution of Plots under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Acts and Sections Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Prospective Levy of Land Development Charges Under Section 124A of MRTP Act, 1966 — No Retrospective Recovery for Pre-1992 Permissions. Rain Harvesting Charges and Audit Objections Also Raised.

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur Bench heard a public interest litigation (Writ Petition No.4264/2009) concerning three issues: levy and recovery of la...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Statutory Bar Permits Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants Paid Premium for Extra FSI but Abandoned Project; Court Held Retention of Premium Without Benefit Amounts to Unjust Enrichment.

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Petition in MRTP Act Purchase Notice Case - Deemed Lapse of Reservation Upheld. Amendment to Section 127(1) Enlarging Period for Acquisition Steps Does Not Apply to Purchase Notices Served Before Amendment, as Right to Lapse Had Already Accrued.

The petitioners, owners of 0.54 hectares of land in Pusad, had their land reserved for a primary school under the final development plan published on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Amenity Development Under Appendix 'W' of Thane Municipal Corporation Development Regulations. Petitioner entitled to Transferable Development Rights for developing amenity space on surrendered plot under Clause 6 of Appendix 'W'.

The petitioner, M/s. Cosmos Realtors Joint Venture, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Issuance of Occupation Certificate for Buildings Constructed with Valid Permissions Despite Proposed Road Alignment. Planning Authority Cannot Withhold Occupation Certificate Based on Unproposed Road Not Part of Development Plan Under MRTP Act.

The petitioner, M/s. Vedant Estate & Properties, constructed four buildings after obtaining all requisite permissions including permission under Secti...