Bombay High Court Allows Declaration of Lapse of Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Land Reserved as Public Park Since 1976. The court held that failure to acquire land within ten years from the date of final development plan results in automatic lapse of reservation under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 10
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, owners of lands in Jalgaon, filed four writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act) that the reservation on their respective lands had lapsed. The lands were reserved as site no.165 for a public park in the final development plan of Jalgaon, which came into force in 1976. Despite the lapse of over 40 years, the respondent authorities (State of Maharashtra and Jalgaon Municipal Corporation) had not acquired the lands nor taken any steps for acquisition. The petitioners argued that under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, if the land reserved for a public purpose is not acquired within ten years from the date of the final development plan, the reservation lapses, and the land is deemed to be released from reservation. The respondents contended that the reservation was still valid and that the petitioners had not made any prior representation. The court, after hearing the parties, held that the plain language of Section 127 mandates that if no steps for acquisition are taken within the prescribed period, the reservation lapses. The court noted that the development plan was finalised in 1976, and no acquisition proceedings were initiated within ten years. Therefore, the petitioners were entitled to a declaration that the reservation had lapsed. The court directed the respondents to issue a notification under Section 127(2) of the MRTP Act within three months, declaring the land as no longer reserved. The writ petitions were allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Lapse of Reservation - Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Declaration of Lapse - The petitioners sought a declaration that the reservation of their lands as site no.165 (public park) had lapsed under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, as the respondent authorities failed to acquire the land within the prescribed period of ten years from the date of the final development plan. The court held that since no steps for acquisition were taken within the statutory period, the reservation stood lapsed, and the petitioners were entitled to a declaration to that effect. (Paras 2-10)

B) Town Planning - Consequential De-reservation - Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Upon declaration of lapse, the land is deemed to be released from reservation and the owner is entitled to use it for any purpose permissible under the development plan. The court directed the authorities to issue a notification under Section 127(2) of the MRTP Act within three months. (Paras 10-12)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners are entitled to a declaration under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 that the reservation on their lands has lapsed due to non-acquisition within the prescribed period.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petitions, declaring that the reservation on the petitioners' lands has lapsed under Section 127 of the MRTP Act. The respondents were directed to issue a notification under Section 127(2) of the MRTP Act within three months, declaring the land as no longer reserved. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act
  • 1966
  • Lapse of reservation
  • Failure to acquire within prescribed period
  • Declaration of lapsing of reservation
  • Consequential de-reservation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (12) 8

Writ Petition No. 2356 of 2017 with Writ Petition Nos. 2371, 2372, 2381 of 2017

2018-12-20

Prasanna B. Varale, Mangesh S. Patil

Mr. S.P. Shah h/f. A.R. Syed for Petitioners, Mr. P.R. Patil for Respondent No.2, Mr. S.Y. Mahajan, A.G.P. for Respondent/State

Aminabee Abdul Wahab Malik, Khurshidbee Abdul Gaffar Malik, Gazala Parvin Abdul Sayed Malik, Shamimbee Abdul Rahim Malik

The State of Maharashtra, The Jalgaon Municipal Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking declaration under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 regarding lapse of reservation on lands.

Remedy Sought

Declaration that the reservation on the petitioners' lands has lapsed due to non-acquisition within the prescribed period under Section 127 of the MRTP Act.

Filing Reason

The petitioners' lands were reserved as site no.165 for a public park in the final development plan of Jalgaon since 1976, but the respondent authorities failed to acquire the lands within ten years, leading to the filing of these petitions.

Issues

Whether the reservation on the petitioners' lands under the development plan has lapsed under Section 127 of the MRTP Act due to non-acquisition within ten years.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners: The lands were reserved since 1976, and no acquisition steps were taken within ten years; hence, the reservation has lapsed under Section 127 of the MRTP Act. Respondents: The reservation is still valid, and the petitioners did not make any prior representation.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, if land reserved for a public purpose in a development plan is not acquired within ten years from the date of the final plan, the reservation lapses, and the land is deemed to be released from reservation. The owner is entitled to a declaration to that effect, and the authorities must issue a notification under Section 127(2).

Judgment Excerpts

These are the petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking declaration under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 about the lapse of reservation. The respective properties of the petitioners were reserved as site no.165 in the final development plan of Jalgaon since 1976. Since no steps for acquisition were taken within the statutory period, the reservation stood lapsed.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed four writ petitions in 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking a declaration under Section 127 of the MRTP Act. The court heard the matters together and reserved judgment on 04.12.2018, pronouncing it on 20.12.2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: Section 127
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Declaration of Lapse of Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Land Reserved as Public Park Since 1976. The court held that failure to acquire land within ten years from the date of final development plan results in au...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award on Interest and Costs. Contractual Clauses 64.5 and 64.6 Bind Parties, Arbitrator Must Consider Them.