Search Results for "National Consumer Commission"

435 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 435 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Company in Consumer Protection Case, Holding Purchase of Software for Business Expansion is Commercial Purpose. Company Not a 'Consumer' Under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as Goods Used for Profit Generation.

The appellant, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, filed a consumer complaint before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Del...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies 'Commercial Purpose' Under Consumer Protection Act for Company Purchases for Director Use. The Court held that purchase of a vehicle by a company for personal use of its directors does not amount to commercial purpose under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of appeals concerning the interpretation of 'commercial purpose' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Bar Bodies and Advocate, Holding Advocates Not Liable Under Consumer Protection Act. Legal Profession is Sui Generis and Excluded from Definition of 'Service' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986/2019.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) which held that c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Transmission Licence Without TBCB in HVDC Project. Section 63 of Electricity Act, 2003 is an alternative route; regulatory commission has discretion to adopt regulated tariff mechanism for transmission projects.

The case involves a challenge by Tata Power Company Limited Transmission (TPC-T) against the grant of a transmission licence by the Maharashtra Electr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bail to Developer in Consumer Execution Proceedings for Non-Compliance of Refund Order. Held that Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is penal in nature and bail should be granted liberally unless there is likelihood of abscondence or tampering with evidence.

The petitioner, Suhas Ratnakar Morey, a developer, was involved in a consumer dispute with the respondent, Dhanraj Tulshiram Khaparde, who had paid Rs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Loan Processing Fee Refund. Bank's Circular Requiring Upfront Processing Fee Collection Held Binding on Consumer; Refund Denied to Avoid Unjust Enrichment.

The case involves a dispute between Bank of India (appellant) and M/s. Brindavan Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd. (respondent/consumer) regarding the refund ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Directors Not in Charge of Day-to-Day Operations Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Specific Allegations.

The petitioners, who were directors of Shri Sainath Nagri Sahakari Path Sanstha Ltd. (a cooperative bank), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Consumer Forum Jurisdiction Over Cooperative Credit Societies. Members of Managing Committees Cannot Claim Immunity from Consumer Forum Orders as Cooperative Credit Societies Provide Services for Remuneration.

This group of writ petitions was filed by members of managing committees of cooperative credit societies challenging the jurisdiction of the District ...