Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Company in Consumer Protection Case, Holding Purchase of Software for Business Expansion is Commercial Purpose. Company Not a 'Consumer' Under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as Goods Used for Profit Generation.

  • 108
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, filed a consumer complaint before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi, against Respondents regarding the purchase of software. The State Commission, by order dated 19.08.2019, held the complaint not maintainable as the appellant was not a 'consumer' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The appellant appealed to the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), which dismissed the appeal on 15.06.2020, affirming the State Commission's order. The Supreme Court considered the issue of whether the appellant qualified as a 'consumer' under the Act. The court noted that the software was purchased for business expansion, which is a commercial purpose, and thus the appellant was not a 'consumer' as defined. The court upheld the decisions of the lower forums and dismissed the appeal.

Headnote

A) Consumer Protection - Definition of Consumer - Commercial Purpose - Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - The appellant company purchased software for business expansion, which constitutes a commercial purpose, thus excluding it from the definition of 'consumer' under the Act. The court held that the purchase was not for self-employment but for profit generation, and therefore the complaint was not maintainable. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant, a company, qualifies as a 'consumer' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, in respect of goods purchased/services availed for business expansion.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed; orders of State Commission and NCDRC upheld

Law Points

  • Consumer Protection Act
  • 1986
  • Section 2(1)(d)
  • Commercial Purpose
  • Consumer
  • Software Purchase
  • Company
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (SC) (06) 406

Civil Appeal No. 6349 of 2024 (Arising out SLP (C) No. 14306 of 2020)

2025-11-13

J. B. Pardiwala J. , Manoj Misra, J.

2025 INSC 1314, 2026 (2) MhLJ 484, 2026 (1) CPJ 47, 2025 AIR(SC) 5727, 2025 (12) SCR 189, 2026 NCJ 41, 2025 AIR OnLine SC 1066, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 2443, 2026 AIR(SC)(Civil) 161, 2026 (1) BLJ 52, 2025 (4) CPR 220, 2025 AllSCR 2687, 2025 (6) ALT 115, 2026 (3) SCC 201

Shashank Garg, Divyakant Lahoti, Kartik Lahoti, Praveena Bisht, Vindhya Mehra, Kumar Vinayakam Gupta, Adith Menon, Samridhi Bhatt, Shreya Gokel, Siddharth Tripathi, Akanksha Soni, Shubheksha Dwivedi, Nishtha Jain, Jayant Mehta, Ankur Sangal, Sucheta Roy, Raghu Vinayak Sinha, M/S. Khaitan & Co.

M/s Poly Medicure Ltd.

M/s Brillio Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Consumer complaint regarding software purchase

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought redressal under Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Filing Reason

Appellant claimed deficiency in service regarding software purchased from respondent

Previous Decisions

State Commission held complaint not maintainable; NCDRC affirmed

Issues

Whether the appellant is a 'consumer' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued it is a consumer; respondent contended purchase was for commercial purpose

Ratio Decidendi

A company purchasing goods or services for commercial purpose, such as business expansion, does not qualify as a 'consumer' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

Judgment Excerpts

The issue which falls for our consideration is whether in respect of the goods purchased/services availed, the appellant would qualify as a 'consumer' as defined in Section 2(1)(d) of the 1986 Act.

Procedural History

Appellant filed Consumer Complaint No. 515 of 2019 before State Commission, Delhi, which was dismissed on 19.08.2019. Appeal to NCDRC (First Appeal No. 1977 of 2019) dismissed on 15.06.2020. Then SLP filed before Supreme Court, which was converted to Civil Appeal No. 6349 of 2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Consumer Protection Act, 1986: Section 2(1)(d), Section 2(1)(m), Section 3
  • General Clauses Act: Section 3(42)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Company in Consumer Protection Case, Holding Purchase of Software for Business Expansion is Commercial Purpose. Company Not a 'Consumer' Under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as Goods Used for Profit...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in NDPS Act Case for Possession of 17.5 Kg Ganja — Chance Recovery from Baggage Does Not Require Compliance with Sections 42 and 50. Evidence of Seizure and Forensic Report Sufficient to Sustain Con...