Search Results for "Gujarat Mineral Rules 2017"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Gujarat Mineral Rules 2017"

37 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 37 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Withdrawal of NOC for Mining Activities — Forest Department Cannot Revoke No Objection Certificate Without Providing Opportunity of Hearing and Without Following Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that withdrawal of NOC without notice and hearing is arbitrary and violative of natural justice under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

21 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Mr. H.K. Lakshman Gowda, filed two writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Kar...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Revision Application, Discharges Applicant in Illegal Mining Case Due to Lack of Valid Authorization for Cognizance Under MMDR Act. The court held that in the absence of valid authorization, the Special Judge could not take cognizance of offences under Sections 4, 12, 22, 23 of MMDR Act, 1957, and Rules 3, 21 of GMPIMTS Rules, 2017, but the trial for IPC offences under Section 379/114 IPC may continue.

24 Feb 2026

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Harendra Chamnlal Mehta challenging an order dated 27.02.2024 passed by the learned Special...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Petrofer Chemie and Hardcastle Petrofer v. United Petrofer Limited. Use of identical mark 'PETROFER' by defendant for similar industrial chemicals constitutes prima facie infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

6 Nov 2025

The plaintiffs, Petrofer Chemie H.R. Fischer GMBH & Co. KG (a German company) and Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited (an Indian company), filed a com...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955 in Assam Accord Challenge — Majority Holds Cut-off Date of 25.03.1971 for Regularisation of Immigrants Valid. The court held that the provision is a reasonable classification under Article 14 and does not violate Articles 6, 7, 29, 325, 326, 355, 356, or 368 of the Constitution.

17 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions and appeals, considered the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which was i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 as Valid Regulatory Legislation. High Court erred in striking down entire Act; provisions conflicting with UGC Act are severable.

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Allahabad High Court's judgment striking down the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Excise Incentive Withdrawal Case — Policy Change Upheld as Prospective and in Public Interest. The Court held that the impugned notification was not retrospective and promissory estoppel did not bar the government from modifying the incentive scheme for Kutch industries.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Union of India against the common judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had quashed Notificatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Contract Dispute. Arbitration Clause in Works Contracts Held Valid and Disputes Referable to Arbitration.

25 Jun 2019

The applicant, Gold Prism Realty Pvt. Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Carrying Cost in Change in Law Claims Under PPA — Restitutionary Principle Upheld. Article 13.2 of Power Purchase Agreement Entitles Generating Company to Carrying Cost from Date of Change in Law Till Approval.

25 Feb 2019

The case involves appeals by Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. (Haryana Discoms) and Gujarat Urja Vika...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds Tribunal's power to grant interim relief under Section 17 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, but modifies order to balance interests of both parties.

25 Feb 2019

The judgment arises from two commercial arbitration petitions filed by Mahaguj Collieries Limited (the petitioner) under Section 37 of the Arbitration...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Bank Guarantee Dispute. Court upholds restraint on encashment of bank guarantee subject to deposit of amount, finding no perversity in the Tribunal's order under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

25 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Mahaguj Collieries Limited, filed two arbitration petitions under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengin...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)