Search Results for "qualifying criteria"

490 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 490 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Cancellation in DMICDC Project — Upholds Right of Tenderer to Withdraw Before Acceptance Under Section 5 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The Government of India envisaged the development of the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMICDC), a large infrastructure project covering approximat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Whether Retrospective Absorption Order Requires Review of Earlier Promotional Exercises for Superintendents (Legal/Drafting). Legal Principle Examined: Whether Regular Service for Promotion Can Be Counted Retrospectively When Government Recognises Prior Cadre Status.

The writ petition was filed by two Legal Assistants working in the Law Department of the Government of Goa, who sought a review of the departmental pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Promotion Order in Medical College Due to Procedural Irregularities in DPC — Held That DPC Must Follow Prescribed Criteria and Provide Reasoned Marks.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Dr. K.V. Satish and Dr. Bheemappa Havanur, Associate Professors in the Department of Forensic Medici...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Employee Retired Prematurely Based on Deemed Age — Resolution Cannot Override Service Rules. The Court held that the Board's resolution deeming age as 18 on appointment date could not reduce the actual retirement age under Rule 73 of the Bihar Service Code.

The appellant, Gopal Prasad, was appointed as Calligraphist-cum-Assistant of the Bihar School Examination Board on 20 May 1970 at about 15½ years of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Government Engineer Seeking Antedated Promotion. Petitioner's claim for regular promotion from 2004 rejected as ad-hoc promotion in 2005 did not confer right to retrospective regularisation.

The petitioner, Shri S. Lekshmanan, was appointed as Junior Engineer (Electrical) on 04.06.1979 and promoted to Assistant Engineer on 15.07.1996. He c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010059832012_1

The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...