Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Inclusion of Societies in Market Committee Election Process — Failure to Provide Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court quashed the inclusion of respondent societies in the electoral roll of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Mantha, for want of notice and hearing, directing fresh exercise after compliance with natural justice.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Kishanrao Sarjerao More, filed a writ petition challenging the inclusion of several cooperative societies in the electoral roll of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Mantha, District Jalna, for the election of the Market Committee. The petitioner contended that the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Mantha, had included these societies without issuing any notice or providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or other interested persons. The petitioner argued that such inclusion was arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and the District Deputy Registrar, opposed the petition, but the court found merit in the petitioner's submissions. The court observed that the inclusion of societies in the electoral roll affects the rights of existing members and must be done after following due process. Since no notice was given and no hearing was afforded, the inclusion was set aside. The court directed the authorities to undertake a fresh exercise of preparing the electoral roll after issuing notices to all concerned and providing an opportunity of hearing. The writ petitions were allowed accordingly.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Principles of Natural Justice - Right to be Heard - Inclusion in Electoral Roll - Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 - The petitioner challenged the inclusion of respondent societies in the electoral roll of the Market Committee without notice or hearing. The court held that any decision affecting rights must be preceded by notice and opportunity of hearing, and the inclusion without such process was illegal. (Paras 1-10)

B) Cooperative Societies - Market Committee Elections - Inclusion of Societies - Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 - The court found that the Assistant Registrar had included societies in the electoral roll without following the procedure under the Act and Rules, and without giving notice to the petitioner. The court quashed the inclusion and directed fresh exercise after hearing all concerned. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the inclusion of certain cooperative societies in the electoral roll of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee without prior notice and opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petitions are allowed. The inclusion of the respondent societies in the electoral roll of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Mantha, is quashed and set aside. The authorities are directed to undertake a fresh exercise of preparing the electoral roll after issuing notices to all concerned and providing an opportunity of hearing.

Law Points

  • Principles of natural justice
  • Right to be heard
  • Notice requirement
  • Inclusion in electoral roll
  • Cooperative societies
  • Market committee elections
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (07) 14

Writ Petition No. 08768 of 2017 with Writ Petition No. 08784 of 2017 and Writ Petition No. 08828 of 2017

2017-07-28

Kishanrao s/o. Sarjerao More

The State of Maharashtra, The District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Jalna, The Assistant Registrar Co-operative Societies, Mantha, The Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Mantha, and several cooperative societies

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging inclusion of cooperative societies in electoral roll of Agriculture Produce Market Committee without notice and hearing.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the inclusion of respondent societies in the electoral roll and direction to prepare fresh electoral roll after giving notice and opportunity of hearing.

Filing Reason

The Assistant Registrar included societies in the electoral roll without issuing notice or providing hearing to the petitioner or other interested persons.

Issues

Whether the inclusion of cooperative societies in the electoral roll of the Market Committee without prior notice and opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the inclusion of societies was done arbitrarily without any notice or hearing, violating principles of natural justice. Respondents opposed the petition, but the court found merit in the petitioner's submissions.

Ratio Decidendi

Any decision affecting the rights of parties must be preceded by notice and opportunity of hearing. Inclusion of societies in the electoral roll without such process is illegal and violative of principles of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The inclusion of societies in the electoral roll without notice and hearing is illegal. The court directed fresh exercise after hearing all concerned.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Inclusion of Societies in Market Committee Election Process — Failure to Provide Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court quashed the inclusion of respondent societies ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Initiates Suo Motu Contempt Against Advocate for Disrupting Court Proceedings. Advocate's Rowdy Behavior and Improper Language in Court Amounts to Prima Facie Criminal Contempt Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.