Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Tender Awards for Transport Services by Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation; Directs Fresh Tenders. The Court found the impugned orders dated 28.06.2024 and 21.06.2024 illegal and granted Certiorarified Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai
  • 25
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

W.P.(MD)Nos.21944, 21946 and 23628 of 2024

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 302

W.P.(MD)Nos.21944, 21946 and 23628 of 2024

2025-02-18

MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

Mr.O.R.Gokul Abimanyu (for Petitioner), Mr.K.R.Buduru Zaman (Standing Counsel for 1st Respondent), Mr.P.Veera Kathiravan (Additional Advocate General for 2nd Respondent), Mr.H.Arumugam (for 3rd Respondent in W.P.21944), Mr.Ajmal Khan, Senior Counsel and Mr.V.S.Rishikesh (for 3rd Respondent in W.P.21946)

AAR Transport Company, represented by its Sole Proprietor A.Ranjith (W.P.21944/2024 and W.P.21946/2024); A.K.M.K. Transports, represented by its Partner A.L.Sivakumar (W.P.23628/2024)

1. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Chennai; 2. The Deputy Collector/Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation (Virudhunagar for 21944, Theni for 21946); 3. M/s.Kandasamy & Co., Namakkal (21944); M/s.Karthikeya Enterprises, Namakkal (21946); [Respondents for W.P.23628 of 2024 not fully listed]

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to tender award for transport services by Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation through writ petitions under Article 226

Remedy Sought

Quashing of impugned orders dated 28.06.2024 and 21.06.2024 and direction to call for fresh tenders

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Appellate Order Dismissing GST Appeal as Time-Barred Without Considering Merits — Directs Restoration and Fresh Adjudication. Pre-deposit of 10% of disputed tax demand is mandatory for maintainability of appeal under...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case by Restoring Arbitral Award. High Court's Setting Aside of Award Under Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Found Erroneous as It Exceeded Scope of Judicial Review.