Search Results for "deemed acquisition lapsed"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "deemed acquisition lapsed"

360 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 360 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Petitioners Failed to Demonstrate Non-Compliance with Both Conditions of Section 24(2). The court held that for acquisition to lapse under Section 24(2), both non-payment of compensation and non-taking of possession must be established, and the burden lies on the petitioner.

2 Mar 2026

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original owner Amratlal Dharamchand Shah, filed a writ petition on 19.07.2019 seeking a declaration that the acqui...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Landowner's Petition in Land Acquisition Case Due to Delay in Final Notification Under Section 11(7) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Preliminary Notification Deemed Rescinded as Final Notification Not Issued Within Statutory Period.

9 Dec 2024

The petitioner, Sri K. Ganganna, owned lands that were acquired by the respondents for the Indian Railways. A preliminary notification under Section 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

18 Jun 2024

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Does Not Lapse as Possession Was Taken, Applying Constitution Bench Interpretation That 'Or' in Section 24(2) Means 'Nor' or 'And', Overruling Pune Municipal Corporation Precedent.

13 Mar 2023

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the High Court of Delhi allowed a writ petition, declaring the acquisition deemed to have lapsed ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Reversing High Court's Deemed Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as Possession Was Taken, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation, Following Indore Development Authority Constitution Bench Ruling.

17 Feb 2023

The dispute arose from a land acquisition matter where the Land and Building Department and Land Acquisition Collector appealed against a High Court j...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case, Reversing High Court's Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Did Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 as Possession Was Taken, Satisfying Only One of Twin Conditions Required for Deemed Lapse.

20 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the Delhi Development Authority against a judgment of the Delhi High Court which had declared that land acquisiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Overruled Precedent and Lack of Title. High Court's Declaration of Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Quashed as Possession Was Taken and Pune Municipal Corporation Precedent Overruled.

13 Jan 2023

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Delhi, which had allowed a writ petition and declared that land acquisition was deemed to have l...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows DDA Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — High Court Order Set Aside. Compensation Non-Payment Does Not Automatically Trigger Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 When Possession Has Been Taken.

9 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which had declared t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Claim Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. High Court's reliance on overruled Pune Municipal Corporation decision renders declaration of lapse unsustainable.

2 Dec 2022

The Government of NCT of Delhi and another appealed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which declared that the acquisition proceedings conce...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Condonation of Delay in Land Acquisition Appeal Filed Beyond 120 Days Under 2013 Act. Issue of Whether Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Section 74(1) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 Remains to be Decided.

25 Sep 2019

The Deputy Commissioner and Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bengaluru (SLAO) filed an appeal under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 a...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)