High Court of Karnataka Allows Landowner's Petition in Land Acquisition Case Due to Delay in Final Notification Under Section 11(7) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Preliminary Notification Deemed Rescinded as Final Notification Not Issued Within Statutory Period.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sri K. Ganganna, owned lands that were acquired by the respondents for the Indian Railways. A preliminary notification under Section 11(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (the Act) was issued on 19.06.2020. The petitioner challenged the acquisition on the ground that there was a delay in passing the final notification, contrary to the provisions of the Act. The court considered whether the preliminary notification should be deemed rescinded under Section 11(7) of the Act due to the failure to issue the final notification within the statutory period. The court found that the time for publishing the final notification had been extended, but the final notification was not passed within the prescribed time. Consequently, the court held that the preliminary notification is deemed to have been rescinded under Section 11(7) of the Act. The petition was allowed, and the respondents were directed to treat the preliminary notification as rescinded.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Deemed Rescission of Preliminary Notification - Section 11(7) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - The petitioner's lands were acquired for Indian Railways; preliminary notification under Section 11(1) was issued on 19.06.2020. The petitioner contended that the final notification was not passed within the statutory period, leading to deemed rescission under Section 11(7). The Court held that the preliminary notification is deemed to have been rescinded as the final notification was not issued within the prescribed time limit. (Paras 1-2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the preliminary notification dated 19.06.2020 issued under Section 11(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 is deemed to have been rescinded under Section 11(7) of the Act due to delay in passing the final notification.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The preliminary notification dated 19.06.2020 is deemed to have been rescinded under Section 11(7) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

Law Points

  • Section 11(7) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition
  • Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act
  • 2013
  • Deemed rescission of preliminary notification
  • Time limit for final notification
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

NC: 2024:KHC:50983

WP No. 21451 of 2023 (LA-RES)

2024-12-09

M.I. Arun

NC: 2024:KHC:50983

B.V. Shankara Narayana Rao (Senior Advocate for Sri Chandrashekar T.A. & Sri Madhusudhan J.), Yogesh D. Naik (AGA)

Sri K. Ganganna

The State of Karnataka, The Special Land Acquisition Officer, The Deputy Commissioner

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings for Indian Railways.

Remedy Sought

Declaration that preliminary notification dated 19.06.2020 is deemed rescinded under Section 11(7) of the Act.

Filing Reason

Delay in passing final notification beyond statutory period.

Issues

Whether the preliminary notification under Section 11(1) is deemed rescinded under Section 11(7) due to delay in final notification.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that there was delay in passing final notification contrary to the Act. Respondents' arguments not mentioned.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 11(7) of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013, if the final notification is not issued within the prescribed time, the preliminary notification is deemed to have been rescinded.

Judgment Excerpts

The preliminary notification under Section 11(1) of the Act was passed on 19.06.2020. Thereafter, the time for publishing the final notification was extended, as per...

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the land acquisition proceedings. The petition came up for hearing and was disposed of by the oral order.

Acts & Sections

  • Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013: 11(1), 11(7)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Landowner's Petition in Land Acquisition Case Due to Delay in Final Notification Under Section 11(7) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Preliminary Notification Deemed Rescinded as Final Notification Not Issued Within Statutory Per...
Related Judgement
High Court Extension of Time for Hotel Construction Without Additional Lease Premium. Court Sets Aside CIDCO’s Termination Notice, Grants Extension for Hotel Project with Waiver of Additional Lease Premium