Search Results for "bid extension"

402 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 402 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Delivered Common Order in Writ Petitions Seeking FIR Registration and SIT Investigation into Alleged Cartelization in TANGEDCO Transformer Tenders. The Court Examined Allegations of Identical Bidding and Inflated Procurement Costs Causing Loss of Rs.397 Crores to Public Exchequer.

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, heard analogously by the Madras High Court. The pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 15216 OF 2025

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — Extension of Time Not Binding Without Confirmation Letter. Forfeiture of Earnest Money Upheld Under Rule 9(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State Bank of India (the Bank) against the judgment of the Madras High Court. The dispute arose from...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Contract in Municipal Tender Dispute — Unilateral Termination Without Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Contract Termination Set Aside as Arbitrary and Unreasonable Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, K.I.P.L. Vistacore Infra Projects J.V., a partnership firm, was awarded a contract by the Ichalkaranjee Municipal Council for a projec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions Against BDA’s Land Acquisition Notifications for Layout Formation. The petitions challenged the preliminary notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act and the final notification under the BDA Act.

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners, who a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Grounds for Interference Established. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings Were Based on Evidence and Not Perverse, and the Petition Was Barred by Limitation.

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside an arbitral ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010023912010_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Partially Allows Contractor's Appeal in Contract Dispute Over Interest and Escalation Claims. Court holds that interest under Section 34 CPC is discretionary and that escalation claims not pleaded cannot be awarded.

The dispute arose out of a contract for improvement of riding quality of NH-4A in Goa awarded by the State of Goa to P.B. Ibrahim, a Class I PWD Contr...