Search Results for "pathway"

111 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 111 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Easement of Necessity Over Cart Track in Partition Dispute Between Brothers. Plaintiff Granted Declaration and Mandatory Injunction for Access to Landlocked Property Under Section 13 of Indian Easements Act, 1882.

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit between two brothers, T.M. Thiruvenkatasamy (defendant) and M.Sundararajan (plaintiff), concerning f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Disposal of Appeal Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act Before Removal of Encroachments in Thenpennai River Bed. Court Holds That Statutory Appeal Under Section 10 Must Be Decided Before Enforcement Action Against Alleged Encroachers.

The petitioner, Rajavel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondents No. 1 t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Encroachment on Common Pathway, Holds Dispute Over Patta Land Must Be Resolved by Civil Court. The court found that the pathway was patta land and a civil suit was pending, making the writ petition not maintainable.

The petitioner, D. Arputham, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the Commissione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Revenue Authority to Consider Representation for Rectification of FMB Sketch Error in Patta Lands. Petitioner's claim of mistaken marking of pathway during UDR proceedings to be examined by Revenue Divisional Officer within eight weeks.

The petitioner, Solomon Sahayaraj, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs TASMAC to Consider Representation for Closure of Retail Shop and Removal of Encroachment on Public Pathway. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, S. Aruljothi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Alters Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide in Circumstantial Evidence Case — Death Due to Sudden Quarrel, Not Premeditated Murder. Conviction under Section 302/34 IPC converted to Section 304 Part I IPC as the incident arose from a sudden fight without premeditation.

The case arises from the death of a person whose dead body was found on 3.2.1997 in the verandah of a shop. The appellants, Suresh Chandra Tiwari and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission for Construction Allegedly Encroaching on Public Right of Way. Court finds no violation of licence conditions and holds that petitioners failed to establish any public right of way over the property.

The petitioners, a village group and its president, filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging development permiss...