Madras High Court Directs Removal of Encroachment on Public Pathway in Government Poramboke Land — Authorities Ordered to Initiate Action Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachments Act, 1905 Within Twelve Weeks. Petitioner's Representations for Removal of Encroachment by Private Respondents on Public Pathway Considered; Court Directs Official Respondents to Follow Procedures Under the Act.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 102
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, T. Subramani, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court seeking a direction to the official respondents (District Collector, Tahsildar, Block Development Officer, Village Administration Officer, and Village Panchayat Secretary) to consider his representations dated 29/07/2024 and 16/12/2025 for removal of encroachment by the 6th and 7th respondents (T. Munusamy and N. Munusamy) on a public pathway (Pothupathai Pattai) in Government Poramboke land bearing Survey No. 79 of Tattacheri Village, Kalavai Taluk, Ranipet District. The learned counsel for the Panchayat Union, Thimiri, submitted that inspection and survey were conducted by the Block Development Officer/Executive authority, encroachers were identified, and show cause notices were issued to them, affording an opportunity to submit explanations. If the encroachers fail to vacate, the Block Development Officer/Executive authority must report to the jurisdictional Tahsildar, who is bound to initiate eviction proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachments Act, 1905. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the encroachers were identified on the streets. The court, considering the factual position, directed the official respondents to initiate all appropriate action in the manner known to law within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs.

Headnote

A) Property Law - Public Pathway Encroachment - Removal of Encroachment - Tamil Nadu Land Encroachments Act, 1905 - Petitioner sought direction to respondents to consider representations for removal of encroachment by private respondents on a public pathway in Government Poramboke land - Authorities conducted inspection, identified encroachers, and issued show cause notices - Court directed official respondents to initiate appropriate action within twelve weeks, including eviction proceedings if encroachers fail to vacate - Held that the authorities must follow procedures under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachments Act, 1905 (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents should be directed to consider the petitioner's representations for removal of encroachment on a public pathway (Pothupathai Pattai) in Government Poramboke land.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The official respondents are directed to initiate all appropriate action in the manner known to law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Law Points

  • Public pathway encroachment
  • Government Poramboke land
  • Removal of encroachment
  • Tamil Nadu Land Encroachments Act
  • 1905
  • Show cause notice
  • Eviction proceedings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (04) 185

WP No. 2416 of 2026

2026-04-20

S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender

2026:MHC:1574

Mr. G. Karunakaran (for petitioner), Mr. Abishekmurthy (for R1,R2,R4), Mr. Vadivelu Deenadayalan (for R3,R5), Mr. K. Santhosh (for R7)

T. Subramani

The District Collector, The Tahsildhar, The Block Development Officer, The Village Administration Officer, The Village Panchayath Secretary, T. Munusamy, N. Munusamy

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking direction to consider representations for removal of encroachment on public pathway.

Remedy Sought

Direction to the 1st to 5th respondents to consider representations dated 29/07/2024 and 16/12/2025 for removal of encroachment by the 6th and 7th respondents on public pathway (Pothupathai Pattai) in Government Poramboke land.

Filing Reason

Alleged encroachment on public pathway in Government Poramboke land by private respondents.

Issues

Whether the official respondents should be directed to consider the petitioner's representations for removal of encroachment on a public pathway in Government Poramboke land.

Submissions/Arguments

Learned counsel for Panchayat Union submitted that inspection and survey were conducted, encroachers identified, and show cause notices issued. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that encroachers were identified on the streets.

Ratio Decidendi

The court directed the official respondents to initiate action for removal of encroachment on public pathway in Government Poramboke land, following procedures under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachments Act, 1905, within twelve weeks.

Judgment Excerpts

In view of the above factual position, the official respondents are directed to initiate all appropriate action in the manner known to law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court seeking direction to consider representations for removal of encroachment. The court heard submissions and disposed of the petition with directions.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Land Encroachments Act, 1905:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Ex Parte Temporary Injunction in Land Dispute Due to Non-Compliance with Order 39 Rule 3 CPC. Petitioner's Right to Be Heard Before Injunction Upheld Under Order 39 Rule 3 CPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and Public Interest Litigation on Snake Capture Festival. Court Clarifies that Temporary Capture of Protected Snakes Constitutes Hunting and is Prohibited Under S...