Search Results for "mine code"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "mine code"

314 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 314 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Seizure and Fine in Minor Mineral Transport Case — Tractor Carrying Murum for Filling Potholes Not Illegal Mining. Use of Tractor for Personal Purpose Without Royalty Receipt Does Not Attract Penalty Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

14 Dec 2022

The petitioners, Prakash Tumdu Chaudhari and Sujit Prakash Gujrati, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Explanations to Rule 38 of MCR, 2016 and Rule 45(8)(a) of MCDR, 2017 — Royalty Computation on Gross Sale Value Without Deduction of Royalty, DMF, and NMET Contributions is Valid. The Court held that royalty is a tax and not a contractual consideration, and the impugned explanations do not violate Article 14 or Article 265 of the Constitution.

15 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the validity...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considered a Writ Petition Challenging Retrospective Application of Section 4-A(4) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. Court Examined Whether Amended Provision Applies to Pre-2021 Mining Leases and Whether Government Delay Should Be Excluded in Computing Revival Period.

6 Jun 2025

The matter concerned a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, arising from the statutory lapse of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Orders for Unauthorized Minor Mineral Extraction Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Show cause notices and final orders under Section 48(7) and (8) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice.

1 Mar 2022

The petitioners, M/s. Royale Urbanspace and its partners, owned land bearing Survey No.44/1 at Mouje Borsheti, Taluka Shahapur, District Thane. In 201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Royalty on Ordinary Earth — Notification Dated 03.02.2000 Declared Ultra Vires. Ordinary Earth Not a Mineral Under Section 3(e) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

20 Jun 2017

The petitioners, M/s. Utkal Highways and others, were partnership firms engaged in excavation of ordinary earth. They challenged the notification date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Penalty and Royalty for Unauthorized Excavation of Earth During Sewerage Pipeline Project. Revenue Officials' Demand Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Quashed as Excavation Was Incidental to Public Works Contract and Not for Commercial Use.

28 Mar 2024

The petitioners, M/s. Ramky Infrastructure Ltd. and its shareholder, challenged the imposition of penalty and royalty by revenue officials under Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner in Writ Challenging Seizure of Vehicle for Transporting Gitti; Holds Gitti is Minor Mineral Requiring Royalty and Transit Pass under Maharashtra Minor Mineral Extraction Rules, 2013. Transportation Without Valid Secondary Transport Pass and GPS Justifies Seizure and Penalty, and Petitioner's Lack of Clean Hands Bars Relief.

28 Jul 2026

The petitioner, a transporter, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, aggrieved by the sei...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Bail Application in PMLA Case Involving Alleged Resort Construction and Predicate Offences. Applicant Challenged Validity of ECIR and Inclusion of FIR No. 177 of 2022 Offences, Arguing Absence of Proceeds of Crime Under Section 2(1)(u) of Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002.

6 Dec 2023

The matter before the Bombay High Court was a bail application by the applicant, accused No.1 in ECIR/MBZO-I/57/2022, leading to Special Case No. 634 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)