Search Results for "Section 22-A"

94 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 94 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging DICGC Act Provisions in Cooperative Bank Deposit Insurance Dispute. Sections 18A(5) and 21(3)(4) of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961, held constitutional and not arbitrary.

The appellant, Sri G.K. Gururaja Rao, Secretary of Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank Niyamitha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Un-Executed Conveyance Deed Due to Vendor Fraud. Limitation Period for Application Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Runs from Date of Instrument, Not from Date of Cancellation Deed.

The appellant, a bona fide purchaser, agreed to buy property from Mohammed Hanif Ahmed Fitwala and prepared a conveyance deed. On 7 May 2014, the deed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Director in Minimum Wages Act Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Complaint Failed to Establish Director Was In-Charge of Company's Business Under Section 22C of Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Making Prosecution Unmaintainable.

The dispute arose from a criminal complaint filed against Dayle De'Souza, a director of Writer Safeguard Pvt. Ltd., alleging violations of the Minimum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Sales Tax Revision Case Due to Limitation Bar. Revisional Order Ante-Dated to Circumvent Limitation Under Section 22A of Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 Set Aside.

The appellant-assessee, M/s. Shree Sheele Pvt. Ltd., was subjected to penalty under Section 5A(3)(i) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 by an order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...