High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Sales Tax Revision Case Due to Limitation Bar. Revisional Order Ante-Dated to Circumvent Limitation Under Section 22A of Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 Set Aside.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 66
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant-assessee, M/s. Shree Sheele Pvt. Ltd., was subjected to penalty under Section 5A(3)(i) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 by an order dated 26.09.2005. The assessee appealed, and the Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes allowed the appeal on 18.03.2006, setting aside the penalty. Subsequently, the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes issued a show cause notice on 02.09.2009 (served on 19.09.2009) proposing to revise the appellate order under Section 22A of the Act. The assessee filed a reply on 20.03.2010, received on 08.04.2010. The Additional Commissioner passed the revisional order on 13.12.2011, setting aside the appellate order and directing the Assessing Officer to issue a revised demand notice. The assessee challenged this revisional order before the High Court. The High Court examined the limitation period under Section 22A, which provides a period of four years from the date of the order sought to be revised. The order sought to be revised was dated 18.03.2006, so the limitation expired on 17.03.2010. The revisional order was passed on 13.12.2011, which was beyond the limitation period. The court noted that the revisional order was ante-dated to appear as if it was passed within limitation, but the actual date of passing was 13.12.2011. The court held that the revisional order was barred by limitation and liable to be set aside. The appeals were allowed, and the revisional order was quashed.

Headnote

A) Limitation - Revisional Powers - Section 22A Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Ante-dating of Order - The Additional Commissioner issued a show cause notice on 02.09.2009 for revising an order dated 18.03.2006. The limitation period of four years from the date of the order sought to be revised expired on 17.03.2010. The revisional order was passed on 13.12.2011, which was beyond the limitation period. The court found that the order was ante-dated to circumvent limitation, and held that the revisional order was barred by limitation and liable to be set aside. (Paras 2-5)

B) Limitation - Computation - Section 22A Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - The period of limitation of four years for exercising revisional powers under Section 22A is to be computed from the date of the order sought to be revised. In this case, the order dated 18.03.2006 could be revised only up to 17.03.2010. The revisional order passed on 13.12.2011 was clearly beyond the limitation period. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the revisional order passed under Section 22A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 was within the period of limitation, and whether the order was ante-dated to overcome the limitation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the appeals, set aside the revisional order dated 13.12.2011 passed by the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, and quashed the same.

Law Points

  • Limitation period under Section 22A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act
  • 1957 is mandatory
  • Ante-dating of order to circumvent limitation is illegal
  • Revisional authority cannot revise order beyond limitation period
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (08) 4

STA No.25/2012 & STA No.129/2012

2015-08-05

Justice Vineet Saran, Justice B. Manohar

Sri K.J. Kamath for appellant, Sri T.K. Vedamurthy, HCGP for respondent

M/s. Shree Sheele Pvt. Ltd.

The Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Zone-II, Bangalore

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Sales tax revision appeals against revisional order under Section 22A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

Remedy Sought

The appellant-assessee sought quashing of the revisional order dated 13.12.2011 passed by the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes.

Filing Reason

The revisional order was passed beyond the limitation period of four years under Section 22A and was ante-dated to circumvent limitation.

Previous Decisions

The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes allowed the appeal on 18.03.2006, setting aside the penalty. The Additional Commissioner revised that order on 13.12.2011.

Issues

Whether the revisional order under Section 22A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 was passed within the period of limitation. Whether the revisional order was ante-dated to overcome the limitation period.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the revisional order was passed beyond the four-year limitation period under Section 22A, as the order sought to be revised was dated 18.03.2006 and the revisional order was passed on 13.12.2011. The respondent argued that the order was passed within limitation, but the court found that the order was ante-dated.

Ratio Decidendi

The period of limitation under Section 22A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 is mandatory and cannot be circumvented by ante-dating the order. The revisional order passed beyond the four-year period from the date of the order sought to be revised is barred by limitation and liable to be set aside.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a classic case of the officer ante-dating an order of revision only in order to overcome the limitation provided under Section 22A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. The limitation for passing an order under Section 22A of the KST Act is four years from the date of the order sought to be revised. The order sought to be revised is dated 18.03.2006, thus the limitation expired on 17.03.2010. The revisional order was passed on 13.12.2011, which is clearly beyond the period of limitation.

Procedural History

Penalty imposed on 26.09.2005 under Section 5A(3)(i). Appeal allowed on 18.03.2006 by Joint Commissioner. Show cause notice for revision issued on 02.09.2009, served on 19.09.2009. Reply filed on 20.03.2010, received on 08.04.2010. Revisional order passed on 13.12.2011. Appeals filed under Section 24(1) of the KST Act.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957: Section 5A(3)(i), Section 20(5), Section 22A, Section 24(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Respondent Authority's Arbitration Clause in Supply Contract by Dismissing Appeal Against Arbitrator Appointment and Affirming Incorporation of Tender Terms. Arbitration Act, 1940 Section 2(a) Permits Written Arbitration Agreeme...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Wife's Petition Under Domestic Violence Act — Restores Protection and Maintenance Orders. Cohabitation in Shared Household for 4-5 Years Establishes Domestic Relationship Under Section 12 of the Protection of Women f...