Search Results for "Section 118(2)"

51 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 51 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Criminal proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot be initiated against directors without specific averments of their role in the company's affairs.

The case involves two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) challenging a common order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Defamation Complaint Against Company Officials for Termination Letter Sent to Prospective Employer. Communication of termination to a prospective employer does not amount to publication to a third party under Section 500 IPC.

The applicants, who were employees of Future Generali India Life Insurance Company Limited, challenged an order dated 30/11/2017 passed by the Judicia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Confiscation Orders Under Central Excise Act and SARFAESI Act. Commissioner's Use of Omitted Rule 173Q(2) Invalid and SARFAESI Act Grants Priority to Secured Creditors Over Excise Dues.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by Punjab National Bank. The bank had extended credit fa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Copyright Infringement Case — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Film Release. Plaintiff Failed to Establish Sufficient Similarity Between His Story and the Film 'Jannat 2' to Restrain Its Release.

The appellant, Kapil Chopra, filed a suit against Kunal Deshmukh (director), Vishesh Films India Pvt. Ltd. (producer), and Fox Star Studios Private Li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Labour Court Award Rejecting Reference on Ground of 'Industry' — Irrigation Department Held to Be an Industry Under Section 2(j) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court set aside the award and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication on merits.

The petitioner, Shri Dnyaneshwar B. Ganwat, was employed as a watchman by the respondent, Karyakari Abhiyanta Chaskaman Prakalp Vibhag (Irrigation Dep...