Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Returned Candidate in Karnataka Legislative Council Election Dispute — Nominated Members' Voting Rights Upheld. The Court held that nominated councillors under Section 352(1)(b) of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 are entitled to vote, reversing the High Court's decision that had set aside the election.

In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case pertains to the election to the Karnataka Legislative Council from the 12-Chikkamagaluru Local Authorities Constituency held in 2021. The constituency comprises members of various local bodies including Zilla Panchayat, Taluk Panchayat, Municipal Councils, and Town Panchayats. In four Town Panchayats, namely Koppa, Mudigere, Sringeri, and Narasimharajapura, three members each were nominated by the State Government under Section 352(1)(b) of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 (KMA), resulting in a total of 12 nominated councillors whose names were included in the electoral rolls. Elections were notified on 16.11.2021, polling took place on 10.12.2021, and counting was conducted on 14.12.2021. Out of 2410 votes polled, 2371 votes were valid. The appellant secured 1188 votes (including votes of nominated members), while Respondent No.1 secured 1182 votes, and the appellant was declared elected by a narrow margin of 6 votes. The election of the returned candidate was challenged by way of election petitions before the High Court of Karnataka, which set aside the election. The Division Bench of the High Court affirmed the findings of the Single Judge and upheld the interpretation that nominated members were not entitled to vote. The Supreme Court, however, reversed the High Court's decision, holding that nominated councillors under Section 352(1)(b) of the KMA are entitled to vote in elections to the Legislative Council from Local Authorities Constituencies. The Court allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned orders, and dismissed the election petitions.

Headnote

A) Election Law - Voting Rights of Nominated Members - Interpretation of Section 352(1)(b) of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 - The core issue was whether nominated councillors under Section 352(1)(b) of the KMA are entitled to vote in elections to the Karnataka Legislative Council from Local Authorities Constituencies. The Court held that nominated members are entitled to vote as they are 'members' of the local authority and their inclusion in the electoral rolls is valid. (Paras 4-5)

B) Election Law - Electoral Rolls - Inclusion of Nominated Councillors - The Court examined the validity of including 12 nominated councillors in the electoral rolls for the 12-Chikkamagaluru Local Authorities Constituency. It held that the nomination under Section 352(1)(b) makes them councillors with full voting rights, and their votes were rightly counted. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether nominated councillors under Section 352(1)(b) of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 are entitled to vote in elections to the Karnataka Legislative Council from Local Authorities Constituencies.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned judgments and orders of the High Court, and dismissed the election petitions. The election of the appellant was upheld.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of Section 352(1)(b) of Karnataka Municipalities Act
  • 1964
  • Voting rights of nominated members
  • Election to Legislative Council from Local Authorities Constituencies
  • Validity of inclusion of nominated councillors in electoral rolls
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 INSC 716

Civil Appeal Nos. 9032-9034 of 2026 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 4086-4088 of 2025) with Civil Appeal No. 9035 of 2026, Civil Appeal No. 9036 of 2026, Civil Appeal No. 9037 of 2026

2026-01-01

Vipul M. Pancholi

2026 INSC 716

Pranesh M.K.

A.V. Gayathri Shanthegowda & Ors. etc. etc.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Election dispute challenging the validity of election to Karnataka Legislative Council from Local Authorities Constituency.

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of the election of the returned candidate and declaration of the election petitioner as duly elected.

Filing Reason

Alleged illegal inclusion of nominated councillors in the electoral rolls and their votes being counted.

Previous Decisions

The High Court of Karnataka (Single Judge) set aside the election; the Division Bench affirmed the same.

Issues

Whether nominated councillors under Section 352(1)(b) of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 are entitled to vote in elections to the Karnataka Legislative Council from Local Authorities Constituencies.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that nominated members are 'members' of the local authority and entitled to vote. Respondents argued that nominated members are not elected and thus not entitled to vote in Legislative Council elections.

Ratio Decidendi

Nominated councillors under Section 352(1)(b) of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 are members of the local authority and are entitled to vote in elections to the Legislative Council from Local Authorities Constituencies. Their inclusion in the electoral rolls is valid.

Judgment Excerpts

Leave granted. The present case arises out of the election to the Karnataka Legislative Council from the 12-Chikkamagaluru Local Authorities Constituency (2021). In four Town Panchayats... three members each were nominated by the State Government under Section 352(1)(b) of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964... The appellant secured 1188 votes (including votes of nominated members), while Respondent No.1 secured 1182 votes and the appellant was declared elected by a narrow margin of 6 votes...

Procedural History

The election was challenged before the High Court of Karnataka by way of Election Petition Nos. 1, 2 and 3 of 2022. The Single Judge set aside the election. Appeals were filed before the Division Bench in Writ Appeal Nos. 1247, 1256 and 1250 of 2022, which were dismissed on 20.04.2023. Thereafter, Special Leave Petitions were filed before the Supreme Court, which were converted into Civil Appeals.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964: Section 352(1)(b)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Returned Candidate in Karnataka Legislative Council Election Dispute — Nominated Members' Voting Rights Upheld. The Court held that nominated councillors under Section 352(1)(b) of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Bombay Public Trust Act Case — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Trust Registration. The court held that the appellant failed to prove that the trust was a private trust and not a public trust, and that the ...