Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Copyright Infringement Case — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Film Release. Plaintiff Failed to Establish Sufficient Similarity Between His Story and the Film 'Jannat 2' to Restrain Its Release.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 96
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Kapil Chopra, filed a suit against Kunal Deshmukh (director), Vishesh Films India Pvt. Ltd. (producer), and Fox Star Studios Private Limited (distributor) alleging copyright infringement and breach of confidence in relation to the film 'Jannat 2'. The plaintiff claimed that he had given a story to Defendant No.1 in confidence, and that the film substantially copied his story. The trial court dismissed the notice of motion for injunction, and the plaintiff appealed. The High Court examined the material and found that the plaintiff had not established a prima facie case. The court noted that the similarities pointed out by the plaintiff were not substantial and that the film was based on a different concept. The court also held that the claim of breach of confidence was not made out as there was no evidence of confidentiality. The balance of convenience was in favor of the defendants, and no irreparable loss would be caused to the plaintiff. The appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Copyright Law - Infringement - Interim Injunction - Plaintiff claimed copyright in a story and alleged that the film 'Jannat 2' infringed his copyright - Court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case as the similarities were not substantial and the film was based on a different concept - Held that balance of convenience was in favor of the defendants and no irreparable loss would be caused to the plaintiff (Paras 1-25).

B) Breach of Confidence - Confidential Information - Plaintiff alleged that he disclosed his story in confidence to Defendant No.1 - Court found that the plaintiff did not establish that the information was confidential or that there was an obligation of confidence - Held that the claim of breach of confidence was not made out (Paras 10-15).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant/plaintiff made out a prima facie case for grant of an interim injunction restraining the release of the film 'Jannat 2' on the ground of copyright infringement and breach of confidence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The order of the trial court refusing interim injunction is confirmed.

Law Points

  • Copyright infringement
  • breach of confidence
  • prima facie case
  • balance of convenience
  • irreparable loss
  • substantial similarity
  • idea-expression dichotomy
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (09) 45

Appeal (Lodging) No.322 of 2012 in Notice of Motion (Lodging) No.1490 of 2012 in Suit (L) No.1182 of 2012

2012-09-06

Mohit S. Shah, C.J., N.M. Jamdar, J.

Shiraz Rustomjee, R.S. Khandekar, Sharmila Nair, Priti Deshpande, Phiroze Palkhiwala, Munir Merchant, Virag Tulzapurkar, Ashish Kamat, Vaibhav Bhure, Ameet Naik, Ravi Kadam, Sanjay V. Kadam, Apeksha Sharma

Kapil Chopra

Kunal Deshmukh, Vishesh Films India Pvt. Ltd., Fox Star Studios Private Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against dismissal of notice of motion for interim injunction in a suit for copyright infringement and breach of confidence.

Remedy Sought

The appellant/plaintiff sought an interim injunction restraining the release of the film 'Jannat 2'.

Filing Reason

The appellant alleged that the film 'Jannat 2' infringed his copyright in a story he had disclosed to Defendant No.1 in confidence.

Previous Decisions

The trial court dismissed the notice of motion for injunction.

Issues

Whether the plaintiff made out a prima facie case for grant of interim injunction? Whether the balance of convenience was in favor of the plaintiff? Whether the plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss if injunction was not granted?

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the film 'Jannat 2' was substantially similar to his story and that he had disclosed it in confidence to Defendant No.1. The respondents argued that the film was based on a different concept and that there was no copyright infringement or breach of confidence.

Ratio Decidendi

For grant of an interim injunction, the plaintiff must establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience in his favor, and irreparable loss. In this case, the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case as the similarities were not substantial and the film was based on a different concept. The balance of convenience was in favor of the defendants, and no irreparable loss would be caused to the plaintiff.

Judgment Excerpts

Greed and deceit are two human traits which are very often part of the stories of Hindi films. The plaintiff has not made out a prima facie case for grant of an interim injunction.

Procedural History

The plaintiff filed Suit (L) No.1182 of 2012 and Notice of Motion (Lodging) No.1490 of 2012 for injunction. The trial court dismissed the notice of motion. The plaintiff appealed to the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Copyright Act, 1957:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Copyright Infringement Case — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Film Release. Plaintiff Failed to Establish Sufficient Similarity Between His Story and the Film 'Jannat 2' to Restrain Its Release.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Identification of accused by witnesses was not reliable as they were not known to the witnesses prior to the incident and no test identifica...