Search Results for "Food Safety and Standards Act 2006"

123 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 123 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Seizure Order in Food Safety Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with Statutory Procedure. Failure to provide sample to the nominee and non-compliance with Section 47 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 renders the order unsustainable.

The petitioner, Satyaraj M, claiming to be a nominee of M/s Maharaja Industries, a manufacturer of Shashi Iodine Crystal Salt, filed a writ petition u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Food Adulteration Cases Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedures Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Failure to Follow Section 47 and Rule 2.4.2 of the Manual of Procedures Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, through a common judgment, allowed three criminal writ petitions challenging the validity of criminal proceedings...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.

The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Where Food Was Substandard but Not Unsafe. Substandard food attracts only penalty under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, not criminal conviction under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the Food Inspector against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Surat, dated 05.10.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Where Food Was Substandard but Not Unsafe. Substandard food attracts only penalty under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, not conviction under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the Food Inspector against the judgment and order dated 05.10.2010 passed by the learned Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Ban on Transport of Banned Food Products Through Maharashtra. Inter-State Transport of Banned Products Not Prohibited Under Section 30(2)(a) of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

The petitioners, including the driver, cleaner, owner of a truck, and a transporter, challenged an order dated 15/7/2020 issued by the Food Safety Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Revision Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case — Substandard Food Not Injurious to Health Attracts Only Penalty Under FSS Act, 2006. Acquittal Upheld as Food Article Was Substandard but Not Unsafe, Relying on Nemi Chand v. State of Rajasthan.

The applicant, Mahesh Jayantilal Rana, filed a Criminal Revision Application under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...