High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Proprietor in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure Under Section 11 of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Non-compliance with statutory sampling procedure under Section 11 of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 vitiates the prosecution.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 147
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sri C. Veerabhadra Babu, proprietor of Sri Rangam Oil Industries, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of a complaint dated 03.12.2016 and FIR in Crime No.485/2016 registered by Challakere Police, Chitradurga District, within the jurisdiction of the Principal Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Challakere. The petitioner contended that the complaint and FIR were arbitrary, opposed to law, equity, and justice, and amounted to an abuse of the process of court. The respondents were the State of Karnataka, represented by the Challakere Police, and the Food Inspector, Taluk Office, Challakere. The High Court of Karnataka, presided over by Hon'ble Mr Justice Suraj Govindaraj, admitted the petition and, after hearing the parties, quashed the complaint and FIR. The court held that the mandatory sampling procedure under Section 11 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 had not been complied with, which rendered the prosecution invalid. The court did not provide detailed reasoning in the order but allowed the petition, thereby quashing the proceedings.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Abuse of Process - FIR quashed where mandatory sampling procedure under Section 11 of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 not followed - Held that non-compliance with statutory sampling procedure vitiates the prosecution (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and complaint against the petitioner under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 are liable to be quashed due to non-compliance with mandatory sampling procedure under Section 11 of the Act?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The complaint dated 03.12.2016 and FIR in Crime No.485/2016 registered by Challakere Police are quashed.

Law Points

  • Mandatory sampling procedure under Section 11 of Food Safety and Standards Act
  • 2006
  • Non-compliance renders prosecution invalid
  • Quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (KAR) (09) 34

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9689 OF 2016

2022-09-26

SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

S.P.KULKARNI, Senior Counsel, KITTUR JAMAL SAB IMAMSAB., Advocate for petitioner; SRI MAHESH SHETTY, HCGP for respondents

Sri C. Veerabhadra Babu

The State of Karnataka, Food Inspector

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of complaint and FIR in a food adulteration case.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of complaint dated 03.12.2016 and FIR in Crime No.485/2016 registered by Challakere Police.

Filing Reason

Petitioner alleged that the complaint and FIR were arbitrary, opposed to law, equity, and justice, and amounted to abuse of process of court.

Issues

Whether the FIR and complaint are liable to be quashed due to non-compliance with mandatory sampling procedure under Section 11 of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the mandatory sampling procedure under Section 11 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 was not complied with. Respondents opposed the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

Non-compliance with mandatory sampling procedure under Section 11 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 renders the prosecution invalid, warranting quashing of the FIR and complaint under Section 482 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: ... Quash the complaint dtd: 03.12.2016 and FIR in Crime No.485/2016 ... The petition is allowed. The complaint dated 03.12.2016 and FIR in Crime No.485/2016 registered by Challakere Police are quashed.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru seeking quashing of complaint and FIR. The court admitted the petition and after hearing, allowed it on 26.09.2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006: Section 11
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating OBC Certificate Despite Favorable Vigilance Report. Rule 17(11)(i) of Maharashtra SC, ST, OBC Rules, 2012 Mandates Acceptance of Vigilance Report Absent Co...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Panshet Dam Rehabilitation — Land Acquisition Act Prevails Over Resettlement Act in Absence of Notification Under Section 11(1) of Maharashtra Resettlement of Project Displaced P...