Search Results for "CRZ notification"

91 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 91 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Resort Construction in CRZ Area. Petitioner failed to prove violation of CRZ Notification, 2011; court upholds administrative approvals.

The petitioner, Mohinder Kaur Paintal, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the construction of a resort by Respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Golf Course Construction in CRZ Area. Court holds that the subject land is not within CRZ limits based on the approved CRZ map, and the petitioner failed to establish any illegality in the permissions granted.

The petitioner, Sunil Sureshchandra Agarwal, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Construction in CRZ Area, Upholds NGT Order on Environmental Clearance Validity. Construction of hotel building in Colva, Goa, held not to violate CRZ Notification 1991 as it was within permissible floor space index and setback requirements.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions: Writ Petition No. 751 of 2008 filed by Theodore Fernandes and Goencarancho Vorixtte Awaz (an association) ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Coastal Road Construction in Mumbai — Environmental Clearance Upheld. Court holds that the Mumbai Coastal Road Project (South) is a public utility and the Environmental Clearance granted by SEIAA is valid under CRZ Notification, 2011, and EIA Notification, 2006.

The petitioner, Zoru Darayus Bhathena, a resident of Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the Environmental Clearance (EC) gra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows PIL Challenging Illegal Construction in CRZ Area - Violation of Coastal Regulation Zone Notification and Environmental Laws. Construction of jetty and retaining wall in CRZ-I area without prior approval from MoEF and GCZMA held illegal and directed to be demolished.

The judgment pertains to two Public Interest Litigations filed before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the construction of a jetty and other s...