Bombay High Court Allows Tata Power to Implement 220 KV Transmission Line Project Subject to Compliance with Environmental and Forest Laws. The court directed the respondents to allow implementation of the project in public interest, subject to conditions including compensatory afforestation and mangrove protection.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, The Tata Power Company Limited and a shareholder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the respondent authorities to allow implementation of a 220 KV transmission line project between Kalwa and Salsette. The project had received permissions under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, and notifications issued thereunder. The respondents included the Union of India, Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority, State of Maharashtra, Chief Conservator of Forest (Mangrove Cell), Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, and Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd. The petitioners argued that despite obtaining all necessary permissions, the project was being delayed due to inaction by the authorities. The court considered the submissions of the parties and the amicus curiae. The court held that the project is in public interest as it aims to strengthen the transmission network and ensure reliable power supply. The court directed the respondents to allow the petitioners to implement the project subject to compliance with all conditions imposed in the permissions, including those related to compensatory afforestation and mangrove protection. The court also directed that the cutting of mangroves be carried out in accordance with the permissions and that the authorities ensure compliance with environmental safeguards. The petition was disposed of with these directions.

Headnote

A) Environmental Law - Transmission Line Project - Permissions under EPA and FCA - The petitioners sought implementation of a 220 KV transmission line project after obtaining permissions under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. The court held that the project is in public interest and directed the respondents to allow implementation subject to compliance with all conditions and further environmental safeguards. (Paras 1-30)

B) Forest Conservation - Mangrove Protection - Compensatory Afforestation - The project involved cutting of mangroves, for which permission was granted under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 with conditions including compensatory afforestation. The court directed that the cutting be carried out in accordance with the permissions and that the authorities ensure compliance with the conditions. (Paras 15-25)

C) Coastal Regulation Zone - CRZ Notification - The project fell within the Coastal Regulation Zone, and the court noted that the Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority had granted clearance. The court directed that the project be implemented in compliance with the CRZ Notification, 2011 and any subsequent amendments. (Paras 10-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners are entitled to implement the 220 KV transmission line project between Kalwa and Salsette pursuant to permissions granted under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, and related notifications, and whether the respondents can be directed to allow the implementation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is disposed of with directions to the respondents to allow the petitioners to implement the 220 KV transmission line project subject to compliance with all conditions imposed in the permissions, including those related to compensatory afforestation and mangrove protection. The authorities are directed to ensure compliance with environmental safeguards.

Law Points

  • Environmental Law
  • Forest Conservation
  • Coastal Regulation Zone
  • Transmission Line
  • Public Interest
  • Sustainable Development
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (03) 47

WRIT PETITION NO.1207 OF 2022

2022-03-02

A.A. Sayed, Abhay Ahuja

Dr. Milind Sathe, Senior Counsel & Mr. Bhushan Deshmukh, Counsel a/w Mr. H.N. Vakil i/by Mulla & Mulla and Craigie Blunt & Caroe for the Petitioners; Mr. Advait M. Sethna i/by Mr. N.R. Bubna for Respondent No.1-UOI; Mr. A.L. Patki, Additional GP for Respondent-State; Mr. Abhijeet A. Joshi a/w Ms. Varsha Sawant for Respondent No.6-MSETCL; Mr. Pheroze F. Mehta and Ms. Rishika Harish – Amicus Curiae

The Tata Power Company Limited and Hanoz Minoo Mistry

Union of India, Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority, State of Maharashtra, Chief Conservator of Forest (Mangrove Cell), Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to allow implementation of a 220 KV transmission line project.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondent authorities to allow petitioners to implement the 220 KV transmission line project between Kalwa and Salsette pursuant to permissions granted under EPA, 1986, FCA, 1980 and notifications.

Filing Reason

Delay in implementation of the project despite obtaining all necessary permissions from the authorities.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to implement the 220 KV transmission line project pursuant to permissions granted under environmental and forest laws. Whether the respondents can be directed to allow the implementation of the project.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners submitted that they have obtained all necessary permissions under EPA, 1986, FCA, 1980 and CRZ notifications, but the project is being delayed due to inaction of the authorities. Respondents submitted that they have no objection to the project subject to compliance with conditions imposed in the permissions.

Ratio Decidendi

The project is in public interest as it aims to strengthen the transmission network and ensure reliable power supply. The petitioners have obtained all necessary permissions, and the respondents are directed to allow implementation subject to compliance with conditions and environmental safeguards.

Judgment Excerpts

By this Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Petitioners are seeking a direction of this Court to the Respondent Authorities to allow Petitioners to implement the project for 220 KV transmission line between Kalwa and Salsette pursuant to the permissions granted under the provisions of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and the Notifications issued under the provisions of EPA, 1986.

Procedural History

The petition was filed on an unspecified date and heard on 2nd March 2022, when the court delivered the oral judgment.

Acts & Sections

  • Environment (Protection) Act, 1986:
  • Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980:
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Tata Power to Implement 220 KV Transmission Line Project Subject to Compliance with Environmental and Forest Laws. The court directed the respondents to allow implementation of the project in public interest, subject to condi...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Production of Documents in Rape Case — Right to Fair Trial Includes Access to Seized Exculpatory Material Not Filed with Charge-Sheet. Section 91 CrPC Application Rejected by Trial Court Set Aside; Directed to ...