Search Results for "arbitrary exclusion"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitrary exclusion"

783 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 783 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Intra-Court Appeals Against Order Upholding Blocking of Electronic Credit Ledgers Under Rule 86A of CGST Rules; Considers Requirement of Pre-Decisional Hearing and Bonafide Purchaser Protection.

2 Apr 2024

The appeals arose from a common order dated 27.07.2023 passed by a Single Judge in a batch of writ petitions, rejecting the contentions of the appella...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Public Interest Litigation Regarding Unspecified Government Action. The Case Involves Impleaded Respondents Including State Officials and Karnataka Public Service Commission.

21 Jun 2016

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

10 Nov 2016

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutionality of Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2011. Petitioners Seek to Strike Down Act as Discriminatory and Violative of Fundamental Rights.

17 Nov 2015

This batch of writ petitions was instituted by several temple trusts from Uttara Kannada and Belgaum districts of Karnataka before the Dharwad Bench o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Consolidated Writ Appeals Challenging Acquisition Proceedings by Bangalore Development Authority. The appeals were filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act against the Single Judge's order dated 06.06.2006 that upheld the preliminary and final notifications for acquisition of lands.

3 Apr 2025

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Uttar Pradesh Reservation in Promotion Rules Under Articles 16(4A) and 16(4B) of Constitution. Conflicting High Court Decisions on Requirement of Quantifiable Data for Backwardness and Inadequacy of Representation Lead to Appeals.

1 Aug 2026

The case originated from a batch of civil appeals preferred by the U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and the State of Uttar Pradesh challenging conflicting ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka adjudicates batch of writ petitions challenging land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. The petitions challenge preliminary notification under Section 17(1)(3) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and final notification under Section 19(1), alleging procedural lapses in the formation of the layout.

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act.

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Life Convict Seeking Premature Release — State's Order Requiring 26 Years Imprisonment Set Aside. Court holds that Government Resolution dated 15th March 2010 requires specific finding of exceptional violence to deny premature release after 14 years.

28 Nov 2013

The petitioner, Santosh @ Sonu Balram Jadhav, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment on 21st July...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Challenge Against Excessive Enrolment Fees by State Bar Councils — Additional Fees Beyond Section 24(1)(f) of Advocates Act Held Unconstitutional. The Court ruled that SBCs cannot impose any extra charges at enrolment, as the statutory fee is exhaustive and any additional levy violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).

30 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court in this judgment addressed a challenge under Article 32 of the Constitution against the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)