Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Consolidated Writ Appeals Challenging Acquisition Proceedings by Bangalore Development Authority. The appeals were filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act against the Single Judge's order dated 06.06.2006 that upheld the preliminary and final notifications for acquisition of lands.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-09-25 04:42:42
  • 82
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010050362006_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (KAR) (04) 24

WA NO. 1026/2006 (LA-BDA) c/w WA NO. 1093/2006, WA NO. 1116/2006, WA NO. 1164/2006, WA NO. 1167/2006, WA NO. 1312/2006, WA NO. 1430/2006, WA NO. 1844/2006, WA NO. 960/2007

2025-04-03

K. Somashekar, Venkatesh Naik T

Uday Holla, Prakash T. Hebbar, Pradeep C.S., Harisha A.S., G.S. Kannur, Murugesh V. Charati, C. Shankar Reddy, T. Ravindra Patil, Mithun Gerahalli A., Hareesh Bhandary T., D.N. Manjunath, B.R. Vishwanath, R.B. Sadashivappa, V. Vishwanath, D.R. Ravishankar, H.S. Santhosh

Smt. Gangamma (since deceased) and Ashwathrama (WA 1026/2006); T N Ramaiah and others (WA 1093/2006); Jayalakshmamma and others (WA 1116/2006); Munivenkatamma and others (WA 1164/2006); Chennbasappa @ Chennbasavaiah (WA 1167/2006); and others in connected appeals.

State of Karnataka, Bangalore Development Authority, Special Land Acquisition Officer, and others (including impleaded respondents in some appeals)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Appeals under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act challenging a Single Judge order that upheld land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Bangalore Development Authority.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside the Single Judge's order dated 06.06.2006 and to quash the preliminary and final notifications issued by the Bangalore Development Authority for acquisition of their lands.

Filing Reason

Aggrieved by the Single Judge's dismissal of their writ petitions and upholding of the acquisition notifications, the appellants challenged the acquisition on various grounds.

Previous Decisions

Single Judge of the High Court vide order dated 06.06.2006 in W.P. No. 2066/2004 and connected writ petitions dismissed the petitions and upheld the validity of the acquisition notifications.

Procedural History

The original writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the acquisition proceedings initiated by the Bangalore Development Authority. The Single Judge dismissed the writ petitions vide order dated 06.06.2006, upholding the acquisition notifications. Aggrieved by this order, the appellants filed the present writ appeals under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: 4
  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894:
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Land Acquisition Bangalore Development Authority Writ Appeal Preliminary Notification Final Notification Section 4 Karnataka High Court Act Single Judge Order

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Considers Appeals Against Conviction Under Section 302 Read with 34 IPC. The Appeals Challenge Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence, Including Decomposed Body Identification and Extra-Judi... 2026-09-25 23:20:09
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Employment Termination Case — Reinstatement Not Automatic Post-Acquittal. The court found that the termination of service was valid despite the respondent's acquittal in a criminal case, emphasizing that acquittal doe... 2026-09-25 23:20:08
Categories
Popular Tags
Writ Petition Natural Justice acquittal murder compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 Land Acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions Against Discharge Order in Corruption...

High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Company Secretary in KOPD Act Case Due to ...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Sets Aside Arrest of Vessel Due to Valid Termination of Charterparty. The co...

Supreme Court Restores Compensation Award to Claimants in Railway Accident Case — High C...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal, Acquits Appellant of Rape Charges Due to Lack of Credible Evi...

Lost Your Password?