Search Results for "Award Quashed"

2567 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2567 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010306832010_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Payment of Enhanced Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Directs Payment Upon Furnishing Bank Guarantee Despite Pending Appeal by Acquiring Body.

The petitioners, owners of land acquired for the Neera Deoghar Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, sought a writ of mandamus directing the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010000842011_1

The matter comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, listed under Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Dismissing Complaint for Non-Implementation of Award. Delay of 4½ years in filing complaint under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 held fatal as no sufficient cause shown.

The petitioner, Kashinath Parvati Labade, was a workman employed with the Department of Social Forestry, Maharashtra. He was allegedly illegally termi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in MSME Contract Dispute with Railways — Waiver of Section 12(5) Ineligibility Upheld. Petitioner's claim for additional wages dismissed as arbitrator's findings on facts and law were not patently illegal or against public policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Truly Pest Solution Private Limited, a Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise (MSME), was awarded a contract by the Central Railway f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Application Under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Condoning Delay Due to Lack of Knowledge. Delay in Filing Application for Enhanced Compensation Condoned as Petitioner Had No Knowledge of Reference Court Judgment and Acted Promptly.

The petitioner, Sheshabai @ Subhadrabai w/o Gyanoba Madale, owned land in Survey No./Gat No.227/5 and 227/9 at village Sakol, Taluka Shirur Anantpal, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Upholds Additional Benefits to Claimant. The Court held that the Reference Court had jurisdiction to grant additional benefits under the Amending Act 68 of 1984 as the reference was pending on the date of amendment.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the order of the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik) dated 29th January 1992, which granted addit...