Search Results for "condonation of delay"

612 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 612 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Restoration Application. Delay Cannot Be Condoned Without Proper Application and Sufficient Cause Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Rajendra Namdeorao Akre, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 11.09.2014 passed by the trial court in Misc. Civil Applicat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of One-Day Delay in Filing Income Tax Return Due to Technical Glitch. Delay of One Day in E-Filing Held to Be Beyond Assessee's Control, Entitling Condonation Under Section 119(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s. Cosme Matias Menezes Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. CMM Logistics Pvt. Ltd. against the Commissioner of Inc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Co-operative Bank Loan Dispute. Court upholds award holding borrowers jointly and severally liable for Rs.9.88 crore with interest under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Abid & Company Steels Private Limited and its directors, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Condonation of 639 Days Delay in Rent Revision. Revisional Authority Lacks Jurisdiction to Extend Limitation Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The petitioner, Naranji Bhimji Family Trust, challenged an order dated 10.09.2014 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Nagpur Division (Revisional A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Quashes Service Tax Assessment Order Against Builder Due to Violation of Natural Justice and CBEC Circulars. Assessment order set aside and matter remanded for fresh adjudication after affording opportunity of hearing.

The petitioner, M/s Maharaja Developers, a partnership firm engaged in construction business, challenged an assessment order dated 23/24 October 2008 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Petition Challenging Remand Order in Rent Control Matter. Landlord Held Ineligible for Permission Under Clause 13(3)(vi) of C.P. and Berar Letting of Premises and Rent Control Order, 1949 Due to Availability of Other Suitable Accommodation.

The petitioner, Purushottam Ramlal Shukla, is the landlord of premises at Dharampeth, Nagpur, comprising two rooms admeasuring 22 ft. x 33 ft. let out...