Search Results for "unauthorised possession"

807 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 807 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Demolition of Illegal Construction in Streamlet Under Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965. Court Directs Municipal Council to Act Independently of Tahsildar's Letter and Enforce Law Against Unauthorized Building.

The petitioner, Kalidas Bhagwantrao Wadekar, a resident of Chakan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a dire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Demolition Order in Slum Area — Municipal Corporation Directed to Follow Slum Act Procedure. Notice under Section 351 of MMC Act set aside as premises fell within declared slum area requiring compliance with Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The appellant, Shri Ramawatar Babulal Jajodia, filed an appeal against an order dated 14.10.2013 passed by the City Civil Court, Borivali Division, Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Admitted a Batch of Appeals from Orders in Property-Related Disputes. The Specific Nature of the Dispute and the Court’s Directions Remain Unclear as the Judgment Text Was Truncated.

The judgment dated 12 December 2011 was delivered by Justice R.M. Borde of the High Court of Bombay (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction). The matter involve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeals in MHADA Eviction Case — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact. Appellant's claim for tenancy rights rejected as he failed to prove lawful possession under Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals arising from eviction proceedings under the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976. The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Summary Suit for Recovery of Balance Consideration Under Agreement for Sale. Court holds that leave to defend cannot be granted on the basis of vague and unsubstantiated allegations of payment in cash, and that the defendant failed to raise a triable issue.

The appellant-defendant, Vikram Trimbak Pawar, entered into an Agreement for Sale dated 23 November 2016 with the respondent-plaintiff, Technocrat Con...