Search Results for "promotion test"

907 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 907 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Quashing of Recovery Notice. Employer Cannot Recover Differential Pay After 25 Years Due to Its Own Mistake in Granting Exemption from Departmental Examination.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Officiating Appointment and Extensions for Chief Electrical Engineer Post. Seniority and Eligibility for Promotion Under Goa Electricity Department Recruitment Rules Examined.

The case involves a challenge by Laxmikant D. Kolvekar, the Chief Electrical Engineer (officiating), against the State of Goa and others regarding the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Age Limit for Promotion of Anganwadi Sevikas to Supervisors. Rule 7(1)(c) of Service Entry Rules, 2021, prescribing 45 years as maximum age for promotion, held not violative of Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution.

The petitioners, ten Anganwadi Sevikas from Akola district, challenged Rule 7(1)(c) of the Service Entry Rules, 2021, which prescribed a maximum age l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Inter-Commissionerate Transfers for Inspectors Under Recruitment Rules 2016. Recruitment Rules Made Under Article 309 of the Constitution Prevail Over Executive Instructions, and ICTs Are Not Permissible as They Violate Separate Cadre Identity Under Rule 5.

The dispute arose from a batch of civil appeals filed by Inspectors of the Central Excise and Land Customs or Goods and Services Tax Administration, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions by Employer in Unfair Labour Practice Cases Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Labour Court at Mumbai Held to Have No Jurisdiction Over Employees Working Outside Mumbai Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioners, M/s. Abbott Healthcare Private Limited and others, filed three writ petitions challenging identical orders passed by the Industrial C...